14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 193:
Line 193: − +
Policy Development Process for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures (view source)
Revision as of 18:20, 11 February 2022
, 2 years ago→Summary Table of Recommendations & Affirmations of Procedures
| Affirm and continue the baseline standard & visual criteria from 2012; increase clarity on the evaluation of similarity of singular/plural versions of strings, which led to some unpredictability and confusion in 2012; set a deadline for string confusion objections
| Affirm and continue the baseline standard & visual criteria from 2012; increase clarity on the evaluation of similarity of singular/plural versions of strings, which led to some unpredictability and confusion in 2012; set a deadline for string confusion objections
|-
|-
| 25 - [[Internationalized Domain Names]]
| 25 - [[IDN|Internationalized Domain Names]]
| Allowed IDN applications and required consistency with root zone label generation rules
| Allowed IDN applications and required consistency with root zone label generation rules
| Affirm and continue the processing of IDN applications and the use of RZ-LGR; consider the use of single-character TLDs in cases where the character is an ideogram or ideograph; allow IDN variant TLDs for existing or applied-for strings only if the strings are applied for / operated by the same registry.
| Affirm and continue the processing of IDN applications and the use of RZ-LGR; consider the use of single-character TLDs in cases where the character is an ideogram or ideograph; allow IDN variant TLDs for existing or applied-for strings only if the strings are applied for / operated by the same registry.