190
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + + + + +
no edit summary
On the other hand, in France, Genty's country, ccTLD management is still not regulated, some ccTLDs are still not managed by France ([[.GP]], [[.gf|.GF]], [[.MQ]]), or not managed at all ([[.BL]], [[.CP]], [[.FX]], [[.mf|.MF]]).
On the other hand, in France, Genty's country, ccTLD management is still not regulated, some ccTLDs are still not managed by France ([[.GP]], [[.gf|.GF]], [[.MQ]]), or not managed at all ([[.BL]], [[.CP]], [[.FX]], [[.mf|.MF]]).
== Deletion of ccTLD ==
Genty is opposed to the deletion of ccTLD. He quoted on his thesis the example of the Chagos Islands, [[.IO]], and on Nameshield's blog the case of the of the Swaziland, [https://blog.nameshield.com/fr/2018/04/23/swaziland-le-pays-qui-change-de-nom-et-dextension/ .SZ] and Kazakhstan, [https://blog.nameshield.com/fr/2017/03/02/extensions-pays-alphabet-et-code-iso-et-si-le-kazakhstan-changeait-dalphabet-que-deviendrait-le-ke/ .KZ].
In ICANN's calls for comments, Genty [https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-ccnso-pdp3-retire-cctlds-05may20/2020q2/000001.html opposed] the deletion of old ccTLD codes, citing the examples of [[.tv|.TV]] and [[.SU]]. [https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-ccnso-pdp3-retire-cctlds-05may20/2020q3/000002.html Supported] by [[Evgeny Kuskevich]], Genty benefited from ICANN's return, suggesting not the deletion of ccTLDs, "''additional conditions should be taken into account which may call for the preservation of the ccTLD, specifically: The ccTLD can still be of commercial, cultural, historical or other relevant use for a broad community and /or if there is a clear successor state, as recognized by United Nations,than the government of this state may show willingness and interest to go on with supporting the ccTLD, which otherwise could be retired''"[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-ccnso-pdp3-retire-cctlds-31jul20-en.pdf].
== Prices of TLD ==
== Prices of TLD ==