14,952
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: − + − + Line 26:
Line 26: + +
no edit summary
* not have a pending change request
* not have a pending change request
* not be in an active comment window for a recently approved changed request
* not be in an active comment window for a recently approved changed request
* have completed all previous stages of the process.
* have completed all previous stages of the process.
All applications in the contention set must:
All applications in the contention set must:
* have completed evaluation
* have completed evaluation
====Accelerated Invitation to CPE====
====Accelerated Invitation to CPE====
Sometimes ICANN notifies applicants that they have the option to request an Accelerated Invitation to CPE. An Accelerated Invitation to CPE allows the applicant to elect to start CPE earlier than the typical conditions would normally allow. The requirements for this process were: if the outstanding eligibility criteria would not impact the community applicant's membership in a contention set and/or if the contention set as a whole had not met all eligibility requirements for the standard CPE Invitation process.
Sometimes ICANN notifies applicants that they have the option to request an Accelerated Invitation to CPE. An Accelerated Invitation to CPE allows the applicant to elect to start CPE earlier than the typical conditions would normally allow. The requirements for this process were: if the outstanding eligibility criteria would not impact the community applicant's membership in a contention set and/or if the contention set as a whole had not met all eligibility requirements for the standard CPE Invitation process.
===FTI Review of CPE Process===
In December 2017, FTI Consulting's Global Risk and Investigations Practice and Technology Practice released its review reports on ICANN's CPE process. ICANN initiated the review in 2016. FTI considered ICANN organization's interaction with the CPE Provider,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cpe-process-review-scope-1-communications-between-icann-cpe-provider-13dec17-en.pdf Review Report 1, FTI on CPE]</ref> evaluated whether the CPE criteria were applied consistently,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cpe-process-review-scope-2-cpe-criteria-analysis-13dec17-en.pdf Review Report 2, FTI on CPE]</ref>, and compiled the reference material used by the CPE Provider based on the [[Reconsideration]] Requests pending at the time that ICANN initiated the CPE Process Review.<ref>[Review Report 3, FTI on CPE]</ref>
==References==
==References==