14,326
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: − + Line 27:
Line 27: − + − + − + − +
no edit summary
| linkedin =
| linkedin =
| twitter = ICMRegistry
| twitter = ICMRegistry
| keypeople = [[Jason Hendeles]], Vice President, Strategic Business Dev<br>
| keypeople = [[Jason Hendeles]], VP, Strategic Business Development<br>
[[Stuart Lawley]], Chairman and President <br>
[[Stuart Lawley]], Chairman and President <br>
[[Len Bayles]], Chief Technical Officer
[[Len Bayles]], Chief Technical Officer
* 2000- ICM Registry was founded by Jason Hendeles in Delaware, USA.
* 2000- ICM Registry was founded by Jason Hendeles in Delaware, USA.
* 2000- ICM Registry, a private company, submitted a proposal at [[ICANN]]’s 2000 Proof of Concept Round, proposing two unsponsored [[gTLD]] strings - .KIDS and .XXX. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/kids3/ ICANN.org]</ref> The evaluators in the Proof of Concept Round recommended against the inclusion of either the .KIDS or the .XXX [[TLD]] strings in the Proof of Concept Round.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/report/report-iiib1c-09nov00.htm ICANN.org]</ref>
* 2000- ICM Registry, a private company, submitted a proposal at [[ICANN]]’s 2000 Proof of Concept Round, proposing two unsponsored [[gTLD]] strings - [[.kids]] and .xxx. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/kids3/ ICANN.org]</ref> The evaluators in the Proof of Concept Round recommended against the inclusion of either the .KIDS or the .XXX [[TLD]] strings in the Proof of Concept Round.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/report/report-iiib1c-09nov00.htm ICANN.org]</ref>
After this, ICM Registry's proposal was accepted and later revoked many times.
After this, ICM Registry's proposal was accepted and later revoked many times.
* 2007- January 6th, [[ICANN]] put up for public comment a revised proposal <ref>[http://www.webcitation.org/5gAwFTjYy "ICANN Publishes Revision to Proposed ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement for Public Comment"]</ref> following changes to the policy of the ICM registry including the policing of any site that signs up to use the .xxx registry.
* 2007- January 6th, [[ICANN]] put up for public comment a revised proposal <ref>[http://www.webcitation.org/5gAwFTjYy "ICANN Publishes Revision to Proposed ICM (.xxx) Registry Agreement for Public Comment"]</ref> following changes to the policy of the ICM registry including the policing of any site that signs up to use the .xxx registry.
* 2007- March 30th, [[ICANN]] rejected the .xxx proposal for the third time, citing that the board did not want to get in the business of content regulation, especially when the definition of "pornography" varies by jurisdiction.
* 2007- March 30th, [[ICANN]] rejected the .xxx proposal for the third time, citing that the board did not want to get in the business of content regulation, especially when the definition of "pornography" varies by jurisdiction.
* 2010- February 19th, [[ICANN]]'s [[IRP]] (Independent Review Panel) issued a declaration in its review of ICM Registry's appeal.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-26mar10-en.htm "Public Comment: Report of Possible Process Options for Further Consideration of the ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD"]</ref> The Panel found that the application for the ".XXX [[sTLD]] met the required sponsorship criteria," and that "the Board’s reconsideration of that finding was not consistent with the application of neutral, objective and fair documented policy."<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/icm-v-icann/draft-options-post-irp-declaration-26mar10-en.pdf "ICANN Options Following the IRP Declaration on ICM's .XXX Application"]</ref> A 45 day public comment was opened on March 26, 2010.
* 2010- February 19th, [[ICANN]]'s [[IRP]] (Independent Review Panel) issued a declaration in its review of ICM Registry's appeal.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-26mar10-en.htm "Public Comment: Report of Possible Process Options for Further Consideration of the ICM Application for the .xxx sTLD"]</ref> The Panel found that the application for the ".xxx [[sTLD]] met the required sponsorship criteria," and that "the Board’s reconsideration of that finding was not consistent with the application of neutral, objective and fair documented policy."<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/icm-v-icann/draft-options-post-irp-declaration-26mar10-en.pdf "ICANN Options Following the IRP Declaration on ICM's .xxx Application"]</ref> A 45 day public comment was opened on March 26, 2010.
* 2010- June 25th, [[ICANN]]'s board approved the proposal.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/technology/26domain.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26srcQ3Dbusln&OP=10b995d5Q2Fzq@yzQ7E!Q5Do6!!DXzXCjCzCQ51zXQ51zD@Q5DQ2F_!5!Q7BQ26zXQ51Q7E!uiQ20_,Q2FDu5 Miguel Helft (June 25, 2010). "For X-Rated, a Domain of Their Own"]</ref>
* 2010- June 25th, [[ICANN]]'s board approved the proposal.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/technology/26domain.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26srcQ3Dbusln&OP=10b995d5Q2Fzq@yzQ7E!Q5Do6!!DXzXCjCzCQ51zXQ51zD@Q5DQ2F_!5!Q7BQ26zXQ51Q7E!uiQ20_,Q2FDu5 Miguel Helft (June 25, 2010). "For X-Rated, a Domain of Their Own"]</ref>
== Services offered by ICM Registry ==
== Services offered by ICM Registry ==
ICM Registry intends to provide the registry service for both .XXX and .KIDS through two of the internet's registry-service providers: [[dotTV]] Corporation and [[VeriSign]] Global Registry Services. Primary registry application functions will be performed by [[dotTV]]. [[VeriSign]] will provide a supporting role for all registration functions, ensuring the registry is reliable and stable.
ICM Registry intends to provide the registry service for both .xxx and .kids through two of the internet's registry-service providers: [[dotTV]] Corporation and [[VeriSign]] Global Registry Services. Primary registry application functions will be performed by [[dotTV]]. [[VeriSign]] will provide a supporting role for all registration functions, ensuring the registry is reliable and stable.
== References ==
== References ==