Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 bytes added ,  12 years ago
Line 45: Line 45:     
==RISG and ICANN==
 
==RISG and ICANN==
The Registry Internet Security Group commented on ICANN High Security Zone and Malicious Conduct Mitigation Programs and expressed that it can not support the major security proposals and procedural implementations included the Draft Application Guidebook (DAG). RISG emphasized that the ICANN security proposals seemed to ignore established security protocols, failed to provide adequate implementation detail and inappropriately broaden the scope of ICANN’s security responsibilities.<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf registrysafety.org]</ref>
+
The Registry Internet Security Group commented on [[ICANN]] High Security Zone and Malicious Conduct Mitigation Programs and expressed that it can not support the major security proposals and procedural implementations included the Draft Application Guidebook ([[DAG]]). RISG emphasized that the ICANN security proposals seemed to ignore established security protocols, failed to provide adequate implementation detail and inappropriately broaden the scope of ICANN’s security responsibilities.<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf registrysafety.org]</ref>
    
The RISG enumerated the following objections:<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf RISG Objections]</ref>
 
The RISG enumerated the following objections:<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf RISG Objections]</ref>
9,082

edits

Navigation menu