Changes

The RISG enumerated the following objections:<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf RISG Objections]</ref>

The RISG enumerated the following objections:<ref>[http://registrysafety.org/docs/pdf/RISG_MC_HSZ_Feb_2010.pdf RISG Objections]</ref>

# Several measures that are included and not part of the ICANN's limited technical coordination role. RISG pointed that ICANN has limited technical coordination role and its primary role is to maintain the security and stability of the Domain Name System ([[DNS]]. According to RISG, this role does not extend to malicious uses of domain names.

# Several measures that are included and not part of the ICANN's limited technical coordination role. RISG pointed that ICANN has limited technical coordination role and its primary role is to maintain the security and stability of the Domain Name System ([[DNS]]). According to RISG, this role does not extend to malicious uses of domain names.

# ICANN's wider policy process in developing policies related to Whois implementation and the clear disregard to the [[GNSO]].

# ICANN's wider policy process in developing policies related to [[Whois]] implementation and the clear disregard to the [[GNSO]].

# Measures included in the DAG not related to internet security such as the issue on intellectual property infringement.

# Measures included in the DAG not related to internet security such as the issue on intellectual property infringement.

# Insufficient empirical evidence, academic study or substantive explanation for most of the proposals to demonstrate efficacy or demand.

# Insufficient empirical evidence, academic study or substantive explanation for most of the proposals to demonstrate efficacy or demand.