However, in a decision critized by some, [[WIPO]] arbitrator [[Andrew Christie]] decided to give Parvi.org to the city of Paris by expanding upon former precedents. Under the header "Reconsideration of the bad faith requirement", Christie determined that even though the domain name was unlikely to have been "registered in bad faith", it can still be handed over to the city of Paris based on the idea that it was later used in bad faith.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/28/2009-domain-dunce-award-panelist-andrew-f-christie/ Paris Wins Parvi.org in Disturbing Domain Name Arbitration Decision]. Domain Name Wire. Published 2009 November 30. Retrieved 2012 November 15.</ref> | However, in a decision critized by some, [[WIPO]] arbitrator [[Andrew Christie]] decided to give Parvi.org to the city of Paris by expanding upon former precedents. Under the header "Reconsideration of the bad faith requirement", Christie determined that even though the domain name was unlikely to have been "registered in bad faith", it can still be handed over to the city of Paris based on the idea that it was later used in bad faith.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/28/2009-domain-dunce-award-panelist-andrew-f-christie/ Paris Wins Parvi.org in Disturbing Domain Name Arbitration Decision]. Domain Name Wire. Published 2009 November 30. Retrieved 2012 November 15.</ref> |