Jump to content

Community Objection: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A [[Community Objection]] is a type of objection that can be made during the public comment and objection period of the [[New gTLD Program]]. The objection filing period opened after [[ICANN]] announced the complete list of [[All New gTLD Applications|gTLD Applications]] on June 13, 2012, and closed after January 12, 2013.<ref>[http://isenbergondomains.com/2012/07/05/frequently-asked-questions-about-community-objections/ FAQ - Community Objections - Isenburg On Domains]Retrieved 13 August 2013</ref>
A '''Community Objection''' is one type of formal objection that was admissible during the public comment and objection period of the [[New gTLD Program]]. The objection filing period opened after [[ICANN]] announced the complete list of [[All New gTLD Applications|gTLD Applications]] on June 13, 2012, and closed after January 12, 2013.<ref name=faq>[http://isenbergondomains.com/2012/07/05/frequently-asked-questions-about-community-objections/ FAQ - Community Objections - Isenburg On Domains]Retrieved 13 August 2013</ref> There were 104 objections filed as Community Objections.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/filings Objection FIlings Announcement - New gTLDs - ICANN]Retrieved 13 August 2013</ref>.


[[ICANN]]'s gTLD Applicant Guidebook states that an institution has grounds for the Community Objection if: "there is substantial opposition to the gTLD application from a significant portion of the community to which the gTLD string may be explicitly or implicitly targeted."<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb gTLD Applicant Guidebook - ICANN]Retrieved 13 August 2013</ref> However, if they wish to file an objection, they must first prove that they are (1) “an established institution” and (2) that they have "an ongoing relationship with a clearly delineated community." [[ICANN]]'s [[Independent Objector]] can also make a Community Objection.<ref name=faq></ref>


==Developments==
On August 21, 2013, 23 Community Objections were terminated, leaving a few gTLD applications without any objections whatsoever. The objections were terminated by the [[ICC]] for a variety of reasons, the most common being that the applications themselves had been withdrawn. Other reasons were matching Objections by Third Parties, or in response to [[GAC]] advice.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14262-new-gtlds-23-community-objections-withdrawn New gTLDs, 23 Community Objections Withdrawn, Domain Incite] Retrieved 12 Sept 2013</ref>
<!--{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
|-
! TLD
! Applicant
! Category
! Objector
|-
| [[.amazon]]
| Amazon EU S.à r.l.
| [[Brand TLD]]
| Prof. Alain Pellet, [[Independent Objector]]
|}-->


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 00:30, 5 November 2013

A Community Objection is one type of formal objection that was admissible during the public comment and objection period of the New gTLD Program. The objection filing period opened after ICANN announced the complete list of gTLD Applications on June 13, 2012, and closed after January 12, 2013.[1] There were 104 objections filed as Community Objections.[2].

ICANN's gTLD Applicant Guidebook states that an institution has grounds for the Community Objection if: "there is substantial opposition to the gTLD application from a significant portion of the community to which the gTLD string may be explicitly or implicitly targeted."[3] However, if they wish to file an objection, they must first prove that they are (1) “an established institution” and (2) that they have "an ongoing relationship with a clearly delineated community." ICANN's Independent Objector can also make a Community Objection.[1]

Developments

On August 21, 2013, 23 Community Objections were terminated, leaving a few gTLD applications without any objections whatsoever. The objections were terminated by the ICC for a variety of reasons, the most common being that the applications themselves had been withdrawn. Other reasons were matching Objections by Third Parties, or in response to GAC advice.[4]

References