.mail: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TLD| | {{TLD| | ||
|logo = | |logo = | ||
|status = | |status = Cancelled | ||
|manager = | |manager = | ||
|country = International | |country = International | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|category = [[:Category:Technology New gTLDs|Technology]] | |category = [[:Category:Technology New gTLDs|Technology]] | ||
|community = | |community = | ||
|priority = 819 - [[Amazon]]<br>911 - [[Donuts]] (Victor Dale, LLC)<br>982 - [[GMO Registry]]<br>1075 - [[WhitePages TLD LLC | |priority = 819 - [[Amazon]]<br>911 - [[Donuts]] (Victor Dale, LLC)<br>982 - [[GMO Registry]]<br>1075 - [[WhitePages TLD LLC]]<br>1787 - [[Google]] ([[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]]) | ||
|keypeople = | |keypeople = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''.mail''' | '''.mail''' was a proposed [[TLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. | ||
==Applicants== | ==Applicants== | ||
# [[Amazon]] - The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | # [[Amazon]] - The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | ||
# [[Donuts]] (Victor Dale, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/669 here]. The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | # [[Donuts]] (Victor Dale, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/669 here]. The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
# [[WhitePages TLD LLC]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Mail Status, ICANN.org]</ref> The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application, as did GMO Registry, Inc.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | # [[WhitePages TLD LLC]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Mail Status, ICANN.org]</ref> The Universal Postal Union filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application, as did GMO Registry, Inc.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | ||
===Former Applicants=== | ===Former Applicants=== | ||
# [[1&1 Mail & Media GmbH]] - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1104 here]. It was subsequently '''WITHDRAWN''', however the Universal Postal Union still filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> | # [[1&1 Mail & Media GmbH]] - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1104 here]. It was subsequently '''WITHDRAWN''', however the Universal Postal Union still filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> It was the first applicant to leave the contention set. | ||
# [[Afilias]] - The second applicant to leave the contention set; May 2013.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13042-afilias-dumps-mail-bid-and-three-other-new-gtld-withdrawals Afilias Dumps Mail Bid and Three Other New gTLD Withdrawls, DomainIncite.com]Published and Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref> | |||
===GAC Early Warning=== | ===GAC Early Warning=== | ||
The applications from [[Amazon]] and [[1&1 Mail & Media GmbH]] was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> | The applications from [[Amazon]] and [[1&1 Mail & Media GmbH]] was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> | ||
The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Mail-AU-50020.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353429319000 Mail AU, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> | The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Mail-AU-50020.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353429319000 Mail AU, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> | ||
==Name Collision Concerns and Cancellation== | |||
[[ICANN]] hired firm [[Interisle Consulting]] to carry out an independent investigation on the issues that may arise from new gTLDs that are identical to TLDs being used on internal networks. The publishing of the report sparked a community-wide debate that later became known as the [[Name Collision]] issue. The firm reported at [[ICANN 47]] that the .mail, [[.home]], and [[.corp]] gTLDs were cause for serious concern since those strings are widely in use by internal naming systems. In response to the report, [[ICANN]] labeled the three strings as "high risk" and proposed that none of the strings be delegated until it could be proven that risk is low.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13994-new-gtlds-are-the-new-y2k-corp-and-home-are-doomed-and-everything-else-is-delayed New gTLDs are the New Y2K, Domain Incite] Retrieved 12 Sept 2013</ref> | |||
In 2015, the IETF's DNS Operations committee began drafting an [[RFC]] with the intention of setting a standard of reserving .corp, .home, and .mail from general use, in deference to the exceedingly common use in intranets.<ref name="boardres">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2018-02-04-en#2.c Board Resolution regarding .mail, .home, and .corp strings], Feb. 4, 2018</ref> | |||
On February 4, 2018, the [[ICANN Board]] issued a resolution to cease processing of all applications for the three strings. Applicants were provided a full refund of their application fee.<ref name="boardres" /> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 18:05, 12 May 2021
| Status: | Cancelled |
| country: | International |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Technology |
More information: 
| |
.mail was a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Amazon - The Universal Postal Union filed a Community Objection against this application.[1]
- Donuts (Victor Dale, LLC) - This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here. The Universal Postal Union filed a Community Objection against this application.[2]
- GMO Registry
- Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.) - The Universal Postal Union filed a Community Objection against this application.[3]
- WhitePages TLD LLC[4] The Universal Postal Union filed a Community Objection against this application, as did GMO Registry, Inc.[5]
Former Applicants[edit | edit source]
- 1&1 Mail & Media GmbH - This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here. It was subsequently WITHDRAWN, however the Universal Postal Union still filed a Community Objection against this application.[6] It was the first applicant to leave the contention set.
- Afilias - The second applicant to leave the contention set; May 2013.[7]
GAC Early Warning[edit | edit source]
The applications from Amazon and 1&1 Mail & Media GmbH was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[8]
The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[9]
Name Collision Concerns and Cancellation[edit | edit source]
ICANN hired firm Interisle Consulting to carry out an independent investigation on the issues that may arise from new gTLDs that are identical to TLDs being used on internal networks. The publishing of the report sparked a community-wide debate that later became known as the Name Collision issue. The firm reported at ICANN 47 that the .mail, .home, and .corp gTLDs were cause for serious concern since those strings are widely in use by internal naming systems. In response to the report, ICANN labeled the three strings as "high risk" and proposed that none of the strings be delegated until it could be proven that risk is low.[10]
In 2015, the IETF's DNS Operations committee began drafting an RFC with the intention of setting a standard of reserving .corp, .home, and .mail from general use, in deference to the exceedingly common use in intranets.[11]
On February 4, 2018, the ICANN Board issued a resolution to cease processing of all applications for the three strings. Applicants were provided a full refund of their application fee.[11]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
- ↑ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
- ↑ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
- ↑ Mail Status, ICANN.org
- ↑ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
- ↑ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
- ↑ Afilias Dumps Mail Bid and Three Other New gTLD Withdrawls, DomainIncite.comPublished and Retrieved 15 May 2013
- ↑ GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org Retrieved 25 Nov 2012
- ↑ Mail AU, GACweb.ICANN.org Retrieved 25 Nov 2012
- ↑ New gTLDs are the New Y2K, Domain Incite Retrieved 12 Sept 2013
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Board Resolution regarding .mail, .home, and .corp strings, Feb. 4, 2018