Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| | | |
| ==Advice Outcomes== | | ==Advice Outcomes== |
| + | Advisory Committee input to the board has been instrumental in ICANN's history in a variety of ways. |
| + | * In 2004, the [[SSAC]] was brought into the spotlight during the fallout from [[Verisign#Site Finder Service|Verisign's SiteFinder service]]. |
| + | * The [[GAC]]'s Early Warning process during the [[New gTLD Program]] had substantial impacts on some applied-for strings. Notably, their advice regarding the delegation of [[.amazon]] was overturned after an [[Independent Review Process]] that determined that the ICANN board had given the GAC advice too much deference. |
| + | * The [[RSSAC]]'s RSSAC037 document, "A Proposed Governance Model for the Root Server System,"<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-037-15jun18-en.pdf RSSAC037 - A Proposed Governance Model for the Root Server System], June 15, 2018</ref> was a critical update to and reference point for management of the DNS root server system. |
| + | * The [[ALAC]]'s advice regarding [[SSAD]] echoed other concerns within the ICANN community. The ALAC's broader critique of policy development processes that lead to unworkable proposals remains a salient topic in ICANN's ongoing conversations about its [[Prioritization Framework]] and the [[Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model]]. |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |