Difference between revisions of ".band"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | [http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | ||
| − | The American Association of Independent Music filed | + | The American Association of Independent Music filed [[Community Objection|community objection]]s against both applications.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICC.ICANN.org]Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 23:42, 14 May 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| country: | International |
| Registry: | Rightside |
| Registry Backend: | Donuts |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Lifestyle |
| Priority #: | 487 - Donuts (Auburn Hollow, LLC) 1694 - WhatBox? (Red Triangle, LLC) |
| nTLDStats | |
| Registrations: | 14,761 |
| Parked Domains: | 6,897 |
| Parked Domain %: | 46.72 % |
| Important Dates | |
| Delegation: | 15 October 2014 |
| General Availability: | 28 January 2015 |
More Information: 
| |
.band is a proposed new gTLD in New gTLD Program of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
Current Applicants
- Donuts (Auburn Hollow, LLC), the company was formed by domain industry veterans that applied for 307 new gTLDs. Daniel Schindler, EVP for Sales & Marketing of Donuts is listed as the main contact for the application. . [1] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
- Red Triangle, LLC, applied for the .band string through WhatBox?, a company that own domain name registrars, resellers and owns a portfolio of more than 1800 domain names. Erik Ludwick is the main contact person for the company. [2]
The American Association of Independent Music filed community objections against both applications.[3]