.cars

From ICANNWiki
Revision as of 23:15, 25 September 2013 by Jonah (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Status: Proposed
Registry: XYZ.COM LLC
Registry Backend: CentralNic
Type: Generic
Category: Industry
Priority #: 295 - Uniregistry, Corp.
1124 - Dominion Enterprises (DERCars, LLC)
1152 - Donuts (Koko Castle, LLC)

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.cars is a new gTLD applied for in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants

The applicants are:[1]

  1. Donuts (Koko Castle, LLC), a start-up registry operator backed by large investors which has applied for 307 new gTLDs.[2] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
  2. Uniregistry, Corp.- a new company established by Frank Schilling, a well-known domainer. The company filed applications for 54 new gTLDs.[3]
  3. DERCars, LLC- the contact person for the company is Guy R. Friddell III.

DERCars, LLC

DERCars, LLC's application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[4]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[5]

String Confusion Objection

Google filed a separate String Confusion Objection against all three applicants of .cars, stating that the string was confusingly similar to Google's application for .car. On 7 August 2013 the ICDR decided one of three objections submitted against .cars, ruling in favor of the applicant, Donuts. The ICANN community initially saw this ruling as setting a precedent that plural-word strings are not confusingly similar to their singular forms.[6] However, later rulings, such as Donuts' application for .pets, showed that no such precedent had been set. This created some controversy within the community.

References