Difference between revisions of ".citi"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|category = | |category = | ||
|community = | |community = | ||
| + | |priority = 1831 - [[Citigroup Inc.]] | ||
|keypeople = | |keypeople = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
'''.citi''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Citigroup Inc.]]<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | '''.citi''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Citigroup Inc.]]<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | ||
| − | Citigroup filed several comments with ICANN, claiming that the .citi TLD is not confusingly similar to [[.city]], which has three applications. In | + | Citigroup filed several comments with ICANN, claiming that the .citi TLD is not confusingly similar to [[.city]], which has three applications. In several past [[UDRP]] cases, however, Citigroup has argued that the two words are confusingly similar, and won, leading to the suspension of domain names using "city" in a manner similar to Citigroup trademarks.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10130-is-city-confusingly-similar-to-citi-udrp-says-yes Is .city confusingly similar to .citi? UDRP says yes, domaincite.com]</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 05:12, 25 December 2012
| Status: | Proposed |
| Registry: | Citigroup Inc. |
| Registry Backend: | GoDaddy |
| Type: | Brand TLD |
| Priority #: | 1831 - Citigroup Inc. |
| nTLDStats | |
| Registrations: | 4 |
| Parked Domains: | 1 |
| Parked Domain %: | 25.0 % |
| Important Dates | |
| Delegation: | 28 July 2016 |
| General Availability: | N/A |
More Information: 
| |
.citi is a Brand TLD being proposed in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Citigroup Inc.[1]
Citigroup filed several comments with ICANN, claiming that the .citi TLD is not confusingly similar to .city, which has three applications. In several past UDRP cases, however, Citigroup has argued that the two words are confusingly similar, and won, leading to the suspension of domain names using "city" in a manner similar to Citigroup trademarks.[2]