.movie

From ICANNWiki
Revision as of 02:51, 24 December 2012 by Vivian (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{TLD| |logo = |status = Proposed |manager = |country = International |language = |translation = |stringcontention = |registryprovider = |registrations = |date = |type =Generic |category = Media |community = |priority = 592 - Radix (Webdeus Inc.)
623 - Motion Picture Domain Registry Pty Ltd
895 - Amazon
944 - STRAAT Investments (NU DOT CO LLC)
967 - [[Donuts] (New Frostbite, LLC)
1112 - Dish DBS Corporation
1859 - Famous Four Media (dot Movie Limited)
1908 - Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.) |keypeople = }}

.movie is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Current Applicants

  1. STRAAT Investments, the parent company of .co Internet submitted an application with the internet governing body to become the registry operator of the TLD. .Movie is one of the 13 new gTLDs applied for by the company. [1]
  2. Radix (Webdeus Inc.), a subisdiary of Directi, which has submitted 31 TLD applications.
  3. Motion Picture Domain Registry Pty Ltd
  4. Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
  5. Famous Four Media (dot Movie Limited), has applied for 61 TLDs.[2]
  6. Donuts (New Frostbite, LLC), applied for 307 TLDs
  7. Dish DBS Corporation
  8. Amazon

GAC Early Warnings

The applications from Amazon and Dish DBS Corporation were both issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[3]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[4]

Radix received a GAC Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.[5]

References