Difference between revisions of ".sale"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
 
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
 
|community  =
 
|community  =
 +
|priority = 724 - [[Uniregistry]], Corp.<br>903 - [[Top Level Domain Holdings]]<br>1071 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Sale Limited)<br>1131 - [[Donuts]] (Half Bloom, LLC)<br>1297 - [[TLD Assets]] (Dot-Sale LLC)
 
|keypeople  =
 
|keypeople  =
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 03:44, 24 December 2012

Status: Proposed
country: International
Registry: Rightside
Registry Backend: Donuts
Type: Generic
Category: Commerce
Priority #: 724 - Uniregistry, Corp.
903 - Top Level Domain Holdings
1071 - Famous Four Media (dot Sale Limited)
1131 - Donuts (Half Bloom, LLC)
1297 - TLD Assets (Dot-Sale LLC)

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.sale is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Current Applicants

  1. Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. has filed for 68 new TLD applications on its own behalf.[1]
  2. Uniregistry, Corp., Frank Schilling's company applied for 54 new TLDs.[2]
  3. Famous Four Media applied for 61 new TLDs.
  4. Dot-Sale LLC
  5. Donuts (Half Bloom, LLC) applied for 307 TLDs.

European Commission Objection

The European Commission objected to all applications for .sale outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.

Just after ICANN's GAC issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the European Commission issued a letter to all applicants within the new gTLD program. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant.

The Commission specifically notes that this objection is not a part of the GAC Early Warning process, and goes on to note that "the Commission does not consider itself legally bound to [ICANN] processes," given that there is not legal agreement between the two bodies.[3][4]

References