Difference between revisions of ".sport"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
The portfolio applicant, [[Donuts]], has applied for the similar string, [[.sports]].
 
The portfolio applicant, [[Donuts]], has applied for the similar string, [[.sports]].
 +
===SportAccord===
 +
The community application comes from [[Sport Accord]], and it has engaged the International Sports Federations and the International Olympic Committee to comprise a Policy Advisory Board (PAB). "[R]egistrants in .sport must be recognized performers, organizers, promoters or supporters of federated Sport, or belong to categories of registrants recognized by the .sport Policy Advisory Board (PAB)." The Olympic Committee has previously been involved in discussions in [[ICANN] regarding universal protections for its trademarks across all new gTLDs.
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 02:32, 2 December 2012

Status: Proposed
Registry: Global Association of International Sports Federations (GAISF)
Registry Backend: CORE
Type: Genericl
Category: Sport

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.sport is a proposed new gTLD in ICANN's new gTLD program.

Current Applicants

  1. SportAccord, is a known as a Community Application, that has backing from the International Olympic Committee. SportAccord has also announced that its registry services provider would be CORE.[1]
  2. Famous Four Media (Dot Sport Limited), has applied for 61 applications.[2]

The portfolio applicant, Donuts, has applied for the similar string, .sports.

SportAccord

The community application comes from Sport Accord, and it has engaged the International Sports Federations and the International Olympic Committee to comprise a Policy Advisory Board (PAB). "[R]egistrants in .sport must be recognized performers, organizers, promoters or supporters of federated Sport, or belong to categories of registrants recognized by the .sport Policy Advisory Board (PAB)." The Olympic Committee has previously been involved in discussions in [[ICANN] regarding universal protections for its trademarks across all new gTLDs.

References