Difference between revisions of ".style"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
# [[Donuts]] (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications.
 
# [[Donuts]] (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications.
 
# [[Uniregistry]] Corp., Domainer [[Frank Schilling]]'s company submitted 54 applications.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/here-are-the-54-new-gtlds-that-frank-schillings-uniregistry-applied-for/ Here are the 54 New gTLDs That Frank Schillings Uniregistry applied for, TheDomains.com]</ref>
 
# [[Uniregistry]] Corp., Domainer [[Frank Schilling]]'s company submitted 54 applications.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/here-are-the-54-new-gtlds-that-frank-schillings-uniregistry-applied-for/ Here are the 54 New gTLDs That Frank Schillings Uniregistry applied for, TheDomains.com]</ref>
 +
 +
==Objection==
 +
Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD.<ref>[http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/08/16/icann_top_level_domain_applications_saudi_arabia_apparently_objects_to_catholic_gay_bible_.html?from=rss/&wpisrc=newsletter_slatest Saudi Arabia Apparently Objects to .Catholic, .Gay, .Bible, and 28 More Proposed New Top-Level Domains, slate.com]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 20:23, 16 October 2012

}}
Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Generic
Category: Lifestyle

.style is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Current Applicants

  1. Momentous submitted 4 total applications, this one under Evolving Style Registry Inc.. [1]
  2. Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd., it is one of 68 applications that the company has filed for on its own behalf.[2]
  3. Top Level Design, submitted 10 total applications.
  4. Donuts (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications.
  5. Uniregistry Corp., Domainer Frank Schilling's company submitted 54 applications.[3]

Objection

Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD.[4]

References