Difference between revisions of ".wine"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{TLD| |logo = |status = Proposed |manager = |country = International |language = |stringcontention = Unknown |registryprovider = |registrations = |date = |type =...")
 
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
===dotVinum===
 
===dotVinum===
gTLD professional, [[Jean Guillon]], was involved as a partner in a .wine and .vin project for a number of years. In February, 2012, he announced that the project would be coming to an end due to the fact that his partner had decided to pursue the extensions without him. It seems the unnamed partner was financing the project and was able to utilize Mr. Guillon's expertise without signing any type of binding contract, and thus was able to dump him from the project.<ref>[http://blog.guillon.com/2012/02/wine-applicant-fooled-by-partner-part-1.html Wine Applicant Fooled by Partner Part 1, Blog.Guillon.com]</ref>
+
gTLD professional, [[Jean Guillon]], was involved as a partner in a .wine and .vin project ([[dotVinum]]) for a number of years. In February, 2012, he announced that the project would be coming to an end due to the fact that his partner had decided to pursue the extensions without him. It seems the unnamed partner was financing the project and was able to utilize Mr. Guillon's expertise without signing any type of binding contract, and thus was able to dump him from the project.<ref>[http://blog.guillon.com/2012/02/wine-applicant-fooled-by-partner-part-1.html Wine Applicant Fooled by Partner Part 1, Blog.Guillon.com]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 21:06, 15 February 2012

}}
Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Niche gTLD
Community: Unknown if Community App

.wine is a proposed gTLD in ICANN's new gTLD program.

dotVinum

gTLD professional, Jean Guillon, was involved as a partner in a .wine and .vin project (dotVinum) for a number of years. In February, 2012, he announced that the project would be coming to an end due to the fact that his partner had decided to pursue the extensions without him. It seems the unnamed partner was financing the project and was able to utilize Mr. Guillon's expertise without signing any type of binding contract, and thus was able to dump him from the project.[1]

References