Difference between revisions of ".wine"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
==Current Applicants==
 
==Current Applicants==
 
# [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Wine Limited)
 
# [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Wine Limited)
# [[Donuts]] (June Station, LLC), one of 307 applied for by the company.  
+
# [[Donuts]] (June Station, LLC), one of 307 applied for by the company. This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/706 here].
 
# [[Afilias]]
 
# [[Afilias]]
  

Revision as of 20:47, 13 March 2013

Status: Proposed
country: International
Registry: Donuts
Registry Backend: Donuts
Type: Generic
Category: Food & Drink
Community: Unknown if Community App
Priority #: 917 - Donuts (June Station, LLC)
1158 - Famous Four Media (dot Wine Limited)
1291 - Afilias
nTLDStats
Registrations: 17,442
Parked Domains: 9,499
Parked Domain %: 54.46 %
Important Dates
Delegation: 05 August 2015
General Availability: 27 January 2016

More Information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.wine is a proposed gTLD in ICANN's new gTLD program.

Current Applicants

  1. Famous Four Media (dot Wine Limited)
  2. Donuts (June Station, LLC), one of 307 applied for by the company. This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
  3. Afilias

dotVinum

gTLD professional, Jean Guillon, was involved as a partner in a .wine and .vin project, dotVinum, for a number of years. In February, 2012, he announced that the project would be coming to an end due to the fact that his partner had decided to pursue the extensions without him. It seems the unnamed partner was financing the project and was able to utilize Mr. Guillon's expertise without signing any type of binding contract, and thus was able to dump him from the project.[1] It seems that neither Mr. Guillon nor his partner applied for the extension, as all three applicants are large, portfolio applicants.

Objection

Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD, on the grounds that it could glamourise the consumption of alcohol.[2]

References