14,925
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 96:
Line 96: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→ccNSO Review
|-
|-
| Accountability || Immediately update the website, which is the most outdate of all SO/ACs || CcNSO Council should adhere to council practice guidelines || Future Independent Examiners should have access to archived mailing lists and be able to join as an observer to the mailing lists<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf Ccnso Review Report Recommendations (p.p. 59-62)]</ref>
| Accountability || Immediately update the website, which is the most outdate of all SO/ACs || CcNSO Council should adhere to council practice guidelines || Future Independent Examiners should have access to archived mailing lists and be able to join as an observer to the mailing lists<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf Ccnso Review Report Recommendations (p.p. 59-62)]</ref>
|}
===Review Working Party Response===
{| class="wikitable"
! Recommendation !! Y/N !! RWP reason/action !! However...
|-
| Communications Materials || N || The pool of next-generation ccTLD managers is very limited; it is not worth the effort || Will make an "outreach and engagement framework"
|-
| 1/3 quota || N || Too limiting and members rely on their employers to be able to participate ||
|-
| Volunteer roster || N || Tried it before; didn't work ||
|-
| Standardize process for nominating/appointing WG chairs || N || Only an issue of perception; members know about the process ||
|-
| IANA Team || N || Already implemented ||
|-
| Limit consecutive council terms || N || Too hard to find other councilor candidates ||
|-
| More participation at ccNSO Meetings Programme Committee || N || Already offer virtual meetings ||
|-
| Real-Time scribing || Y || Will continue to ask for the service || It is up to ICANN
|-
| Improve onboarding || Y || Will continue to ask for the service || It is up to ICANN
|-
| Better mentorship program || Y || Will begin thinking about a framework ||
|-
| Newcomer resources || Y || Depends on improvement to website || Difficult and not urgent
|-
| Update website || Y || Will send a letter to [[ICANN Board]]; top priority || It is up to ICANN
|-
| Adhere to guidelines || N || Council already does; the agenda and decision list are published in time ||
|-
| IE access to mailing list || Y || Depends on information shared || Only for verification purposes<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-faiip-07jul20-en.pdf CCNSO Feasibility Assessment and Implementation Plan]</ref>
|}
|}