View source for Cross Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds

The '''Cross-Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds''' (CCWG-AP) was created to identify processes and mechanisms for allocating the proceeds of [[Auctions of Last Resort|last-resort auctions]] of new gTLD strings where applicants in competition for a common string could not otherwise resolve ownership of the domain among themselves.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP ICANN.org Workspace - Cross-Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds]</ref> The group's final report was submitted to the ACs and SOs for approval in May 2020.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64075095/Letter%20from%20CCWG%20Co-Chairs%20to%20COs%20-%2029%20May%202020.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1600856912000&api=v2 Letter from CCWG-AP Co-Chairs to Chartering Organizations], May 20, 2020</ref> After approval from the ACs and SOs, the report was submitted to the [[ICANN Board]] on September 14, 2020<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64075095/Letter%20from%20CCWG%20Auction%20Proceeds%20Co-Chairs%20to%20ICANN%20Board_upd%2014%20Sept%202020.pdf Letter from CCWG-AP Co-Chairs to the Board], September 14, 2020</ref> [[Maarten Botterman]] responded to the working group on behalf of the board on September 18, 2020, acknowledging the working group's efforts and describing the board's intended process.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64075095/2020-09-18%20Maarten%20Botterman%20to%20Erika%20Mann%20and%20Ching%20Chiao%20CCWG-AP%20Co-Chairs%5B1%5D.pdf Letter from Maarten Botterman to CCWG-AP Co-Chairs], September 18, 2020</ref> In December 2022, ICANN Organization began implementing the recommendations of this CCWG 
with the designing of the [[ICANN Grant Program]].<ref>[https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=222267817 ICANN Grant Program Webinar, Community, ICANN]</ref>
==Background==
During the [[New gTLD Program]], string contentions that could not otherwise be resolved were often awarded based on [[Auctions of Last Resort|auctions of last resort]]. At the preference of the involved applicants, auctions were coordinated by ICANN or by a third party. In the event that these auctions were coordinated by ICANN, the proceeds of these auctions were placed in a fund under ICANN's control. Minus costs, ICANN-administered auctions from the new gTLD round have generated over $230,000,000.00.<ref>[https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds ICANN.org - New gTLD Program: Auctions & Auction Proceeds], as of August 2016</ref> In September 2020, ICANN's financial advisors reported that the auction proceeds account contained roughly $211,000,000.00.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-bfc-2020-09-23-en ICANN.org - Board Finance Committee Meeting Minutes], September 23, 2020</ref> In 2015, when the net proceeds amount was closer to $60,000,000, the ICANN board and org had noted that there was "broad and substantial interest" in the use of proceeds.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Pre-CWG+Workshop+on+new+gTLD+Auction+Proceeds?preview=/53773817/54003920/Auctions_Pre-CCWG.pdf GNSO Council Meeting Presentation - Pre-CWG Workshop on Auction Proceeds], June 24, 2015</ref>

The [[Applicant Guidebook]] set some parameters for the use of proceeds:
<blockquote>Funds must be used in a manner that supports directly ICANN’s Mission and Core Values and also allows ICANN to maintain its not-for-profit status.<br /> 
Possible uses of auction funds include the formation of a foundation with a clear mission and a transparent way to allocate funds to projects that are of interest to the greater Internet community, such as grants to support new gTLD applications or registry operators from communities in subsequent gTLD rounds, the creation of an ICANN-administered/community-based fund for specific projects for the benefit of the Internet community, the creation of a registry continuity fund for the protection of registrants (ensuring that funds would be in place to support the operation of a gTLD registry until a successor could be found), or establishment of a security fund to expand the use of secure protocols, conduct research, and support standards development organizations in accordance with ICANN's security and stability mission.<ref name="ag4">[https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/string-contention-procedures-04jun12-en.pdf ICANN Applicant Guidebook - Module 4: String Contention Procedures], June 4, 2012 (PDF)</ref></blockquote>

==Charter and Guiding Questions== 
The working group's charter was finalized in December 2016.<ref name="charter">[https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter CCWG-AP Charter], adopted December 2016</ref> The charter contained eleven questions to assist the working group to define the scope of its recommendations, and guide investigation into the issues surrounding the allocation of proceeds. The questions covered both operational considerations, such as the structure and organization of the entity making allocation decisions, and guiding principles and objectives for those allocation decisions. The guiding principles included avoidance of conflicts of interest, independence of the allocating entity from ICANN's standard decision-making processes, and reviewability and transparency of the allocating entity's decisions and process.<ref name="charter" /> The charter documented that, at the time of adoption, the accumulated auction proceeds were approximately $100 million.<ref name ="charter" />

==Objectives and Recommendations==
The working group's final report specified that the objectives of the program disbursing auction proceeds should be to:
* Benefit the development, distribution, evolution, and structures/projects that support the Internet's unique identifier systems;
* Benefit capacity building and underserved populations, or;
* Benefit the open and interoperable Internet.<ref name="finalrep">[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/63149512/New%20gTLD%20AP%20CCWG%20Final%20Report_29%20May%202020.pdf Final Report on New gTLD Auction Proceeds], May 20, 2020</ref>

The final report provides three options for operationalizing these objectives, recommending that the board adopt either option A or option B, with a working group preference for option A:
<ol style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">
<li> Create an internal department within ICANN dedicated to the allocation of auction proceeds;</li>
<li> Create an internal department within ICANN dedicated to the allocation of auction proceeds, which collaborates with an external nonprofit organization; or</li>
<li>Create new charitable entity (ICANN Foundation), functionally separate from ICANN org, which is responsible for the allocation of auction proceeds<ref name="finalrep" /></li>
</ol>
The working group also considered a fourth option, which was to distribute funds to an existing nonprofit for allocation according to the rules and objectives established by ICANN. This option could be likened to a scholarship endowment, where the donors had control over the parameters of the award of the scholarship, but the endowed school would be responsible for managing the endowment. It was determined by the working group that that option would be unworkable.<ref name="finalrep" />

There are a total of twelve recommendations, including the recommendations regarding objectives and choice of mechanism, as well as supplemental guidance regarding the questions contained in the group's charter.<ref name="finalrep" />

==Public Comments==
===Initial Report===
Both the initial report and a proposed final report of the working group were published for public comment. The public comment period for the initial report occurred at the end of 2018.<ref name="initpc">[https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-08oct18/2018q4/thread.html ICANN.org Listserv Archive - Public Comments on Initial Report of CCWG-AP]</ref> There were thirty-seven comments posted to the mailing list during the period, including several from ICANN bodies (including the board). Comments touched on a variety of issues and topics contained in the initial report. After analysis and review of the comments received, the working group developed a list of agreements and action items, using the questions contained in the group's charter as a framework for organizing the group's agreements and actions in light of comments received.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138829/new%20gTLD%20AP%20CCWG%20Agreements%20-%20updated%206%20June%202019.docx CCWG-AP Workspace - CCWG Agreements based on review of comments], finalized June 6, 2019 (Word Document)</ref> The tasks and agreements to amend the initial report were reflected in the working group's proposed final report.<ref name="finalrep" />

===Proposed Final Report===
The public comment period of the proposed final report occurred in the spring of 2020. Sixteen comments were received, including a comment submitted by the ICANN Board.<ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17kMjYzoqWtG_JsRELzrmNpZii3BLmh6nZYyj27Jcm1g/edit#gid=427013893 Google Forms Output - Public Comments on CCWG-AP's Proposed Final Draft], retrieved June 3, 2021</ref> The refinements and agreements resulting from the second round of public comment were less wide-ranging than the initial round, with a total of nineteen agreed-upon modifications to the final report.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126425480/CCWG%20Agreements%20-%20Proposed%20Final%20Report%20Public%20Comments%20upd%202%20Apr%202020.docx CCWG-AP Workspace - CCWG Agreements based on the review of comments to proposed final draft], June 2020</ref> The modifications were again organized by their responsiveness to specific questions from the charter document.

===Minority Statement of the CSG===
The working group's final report included a minority statement from the [[Commercial Stakeholders Group]], stating that the working group's preference for option A (creating a department within ICANN to manage the allocation of auction proceeds) was not entirely supported by the internal polls used to establish a preference. The CSG argued that, in fact, while there were eight votes in support of option A, there were more votes in favor of "something other than option A" when taken in total.<ref name="finalrep" /> The Intellectual Property Constituency voiced strong opposition to the creation of an internal allocation mechanism, worrying both about overhead costs, the strain on fiduciary obligations, and the appearance of self-dealing that might result.<ref name="finalrep" /> The CSG did not dispute the "consensus" label of the recommendation of either option A or option B, but urged the board to closely consider the poll results and other factors when weighing the choice of mechanism for allocation of funds.
 
==Outcomes==
In December 2020, Maarten Botterman reported that the ICANN Board had requested additional information from ICANN org in order to support the launch of an [[Operational Design Phase]] (ODP) to explore the feasibility and implementation of options A and B:<ref name="decblog">[https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/board-consideration-of-the-auction-proceeds-report-22-12-2020-en ICANN.org Blog - Board Consideration of the CCWG-Auction Proceeds Final Report], December 22, 2020</ref> 

<blockquote>The areas identified as key information needed to support the Board’s review of the report include:
*Role and responsibilities of the ICANN Board in the proposed process.
*Public interest considerations and service to the stated rationale for the use of the auction proceeds.
*Transparency to, and involvement of the community in the process.
*Risk identification and mitigation.
*Operational needs, including needed expertise and estimated resources.
*Process considerations, such as managing conflicts of interests, assuring ICANN’s mission is upheld, and building appropriate review and auditing functions.<ref name="decblog" /></blockquote>

In November 2021, the final report was sent to the [[ICANN Board]]. It was noted during Prep Week of [[ICANN 71]] that ICANN org had over 250 recommendations to implement or act upon, and that prioritization was thus essential.<ref>[https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/mCoTqybjtiCbJ7AwX ICANN 71 Prep Week Session - ICANN Reviews and Implementation Update], June 2, 2021</ref>

On 12 June 2022, the ICANN Board approved the recommendations and directed ICANN org to produce a preliminary implementation plan in line with the ICANN Board Scorecard within 120 days.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-board-approves-recommendations-of-cross-community-working-group-on-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-13-06-2022-en Board approves CCWG-AP Recommendations, ICANN Blogs]</ref> The [[ICANN Grant Program]] will distribute the proceeds from [[Auctions of Last Resort] in the 2012 [[New gTLD Program]] among approved applications from eligible organizations for projects that support [[ICANN Initiatives|ICANN's mission]].<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-org-delivers-icann-grant-program-design-and-implementation-plan-update-20-10-2022-en ICANN Org delivers Grant Program Implementation Plan, ICANN Blogs]</ref>

On 10 October 2022, ICANN Organization delivered the plan for the [[ICANN Grant Program]] to the [[ICANN Board]] and held a webinar concerning its implementation for the ICANN Community on 1 December 2022.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=222267817 ICANN Grant Program Webinar, Community, ICANN]</ref>

==References==
{{reflist}}
__NOTOC__

[[Category:Cross-Community Working Groups]]