27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − + + +
Cross Community Working Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names as Top-Level Domains (view source)
Revision as of 05:16, 1 November 2017
, 6 years agobasing document was added (it is quite important for understanding of the reasons/initial thoughts of the group)
Membership of the Group included GNSO, ccNSO, ALAC, GAC participants (and as an expert on subject of ISO3166, [https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jaap+Akkerhuis+SOI Jaap Akkerhuis]).
Membership of the Group included GNSO, ccNSO, ALAC, GAC participants (and as an expert on subject of ISO3166, [https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jaap+Akkerhuis+SOI Jaap Akkerhuis]).
In it's work Working Group faced few challenges and positively identified lack of consensus in the community on subject of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-3 Alpha-3 Codes in ISO3166-1], almost the only topic which was agreed upon was so called "2 Chars" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2 Alpha-2 Codes in ISO3166-1]).
'''Work done'''
Deliberations of the Cross-Community working group were initially based on the [https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_42227/unct-final-08sep12-en.pdf ccNSO Study Group on the use of Country and Territory Names Final Report]. In it's work Working Group faced few challenges and positively identified lack of consensus in the community on subject of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-3 Alpha-3 Codes in ISO3166-1], almost the only topic which was agreed upon was status quo on use of so called "2 Chars" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2 Alpha-2 Codes in ISO3166-1]), which are still for ccTLD use only at the Top-Level.
'''Results of the CWG Elaborations'''
'''Results of the CWG Elaborations'''