Difference between revisions of "Cybersecurity"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
*Phone phreaking from the late 1950s through the early 1970s, which pre-dated the creation of ARPANET, marked the beginning of present-day hacking culture. Simple security tools, such as access controls and passwords, were implemented. Then came cryptographic applications, such as public-key cryptography, security verification, cryptographic protocols, and cryptographic hashing.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404817302249?casa_token=deFBX0B2eLMAAAAA:FXPmbrKThtFL1_aSpVTABhyEzhWMiQhyk3wXhXfX5WOewf7FSM9gEHvkYN_TNgqVbn5kJw5pl7Q Hatfield, Joseph. 2018. "Social engineering in cybersecurity." ''Computers & Security'', 73:102-113]</ref>  
+
*From the late 1950s through the 1970s: Phone phreaking marked the beginning of present-day hacking culture; simple security tools, such as access controls and passwords, were implemented. Then came cryptographic applications, such as public-key cryptography, security verification, cryptographic protocols, and cryptographic hashing.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404817302249?casa_token=deFBX0B2eLMAAAAA:FXPmbrKThtFL1_aSpVTABhyEzhWMiQhyk3wXhXfX5WOewf7FSM9gEHvkYN_TNgqVbn5kJw5pl7Q Hatfield, Joseph.2018. "Social engineering in cybersecurity." ''Computers & Security'', 73:102-113]</ref>  
*The Massachusetts Institute of Technology was granted the first US patent for a cryptographic communication system in 1983.
+
*In 1983, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was granted the first US patent for a cryptographic communication system.
*By 1990, [[Malware]], malware detection, antivirus techniques, buffer overflow attacks, intrusion detection, and firewalls were in play.<ref>P.J. & D.E. Denning. (2016)."Cybersecurity is harder than building bridges."
+
*By 1990, [[Malware]], malware detection, antivirus techniques, buffer overflow attacks, intrusion detection, and firewalls were in play.<ref>P.J. & D.E. Denning.2016."Cybersecurity is harder than building bridges."Am Sci, 104(3):1-6</ref>
Am Sci, 104(3):1-6</ref>
+
*By 2006, automated vigilance had become more-or-less the norm, leading Greiner to call [[Social Engineering Attacks]] "the highest form of hacking."<ref>L. Greiner.2006."
 +
Hacking your network's weakest link – you" Netw Mag, 12(1):9-12</ref>
 +
*In the 2010s, cybersecurity went mainstream: most corporations had to say (if not do) something about client privacy and data security.<ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/forrester/2019/12/18/decade-retrospective-cybersecurity-from-2010-to-2019/?sh=60d1b05d4d51 Decade Retrospective, Cybersecurity, Forbes]</ref>
 +
*In 2011, researchers at Lockheed Martin standardize cybersecurity jargon with the publication of their white paper, "Intelligence-Driven Computer Network Defense
 +
Informed by Analysis of Adversary Campaigns and Intrusion Kill Chains."<ref>[https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/rms/documents/cyber/LM-White-Paper-Intel-Driven-Defense.pdf Eric M. Hutchins, Michael J. Cloppert, & Rohan M. Amin.2011."Lockheed Martin Kill Chain.]</ref>
 +
*In 2013, Mandiant releases the [[APT1 Report]], which outlined how China was able to quickly steal intellectual property from US firms. 
 +
*In 2014, NIST releases its first cybersecurity framework, which conceptualized how to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from attacks.<ref>[https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework Cyberframework, NIST]</ref>
  
 
==Government Involvement==
 
==Government Involvement==

Revision as of 18:10, 14 May 2021

Cybersecurity is the practice of protecting systems, networks, and programs from digital attacks. Cyberattacks usually seek to access, change, or destroy sensitive information; extort money from their victims; or disrupt business as usual.[1] Implementing cybersecurity measures is challenging because it is a cat-and-mouse game, and today there are more devices than people.

Ensuring the cybersecurity of computers, networks, programs, and data relies on multiple layers of protection involving the detection, investigation, and remediation of threats. Users need to understand and comply with basic data security principles like choosing strong passwords, being wary of attachments in email, and backing up data. However, many questions remain over whether people can outsmart Social Engineering Attacks. Common technology used to protect endpoint devices, such as computers, smart devices, and routers; networks; and the cloud, include firewalls, DNS filtering, malware protection, antivirus software, and email security.

History

  • From the late 1950s through the 1970s: Phone phreaking marked the beginning of present-day hacking culture; simple security tools, such as access controls and passwords, were implemented. Then came cryptographic applications, such as public-key cryptography, security verification, cryptographic protocols, and cryptographic hashing.[2]
  • In 1983, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was granted the first US patent for a cryptographic communication system.
  • By 1990, Malware, malware detection, antivirus techniques, buffer overflow attacks, intrusion detection, and firewalls were in play.[3]
  • By 2006, automated vigilance had become more-or-less the norm, leading Greiner to call Social Engineering Attacks "the highest form of hacking."[4]
  • In the 2010s, cybersecurity went mainstream: most corporations had to say (if not do) something about client privacy and data security.[5]
  • In 2011, researchers at Lockheed Martin standardize cybersecurity jargon with the publication of their white paper, "Intelligence-Driven Computer Network Defense

Informed by Analysis of Adversary Campaigns and Intrusion Kill Chains."[6]

  • In 2013, Mandiant releases the APT1 Report, which outlined how China was able to quickly steal intellectual property from US firms.
  • In 2014, NIST releases its first cybersecurity framework, which conceptualized how to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from attacks.[7]

Government Involvement

Government leaders have different understandings and expectations of how involved a government should be in a nation’s cybersecurity. McKinsey suggests considering several questions to ascertain a government’s role in cybersecurity.[8]

  1. Who is accountable?
    • Some national and state governments have consolidated accountabilities into a clear structure, such as Estonia’s Cyber Security Council, or have crisis-response mechanisms as in Sweden.
    • Germany has its Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (Federal Office for Information Security).
    • The United Kingdom’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has been cited as a model for government-level cybersecurity.
  2. How centralized is it?
    • Japan’s Cyber Security Strategic Headquarters hosts audit and regulation functions in a centralized agency as does Romania’s Association for Information Security Assurance.
    • India has dispersed audit functions across multiple bodies.
    • Australia introduced a notifiable-data-breaches scheme in 2017, making it a legal requirement to notify affected individuals and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner of serious data breaches.
  3. Relationship with the private and academic sectors?
    • Singapore’s National Cybersecurity R&D Programme supports public–private research partnerships and budgeted $190 million Singapore dollars ($137.85 million) in the national strategy for the creation of the National Cybersecurity R&D Laboratory at the National University of Singapore.
  4. How does it define national critical infrastructure?
    • In the United States, the Department of Homeland Security coordinates a national infrastructure-protection plan and requires sector-specific agencies, such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to develop sector-specific plans.

The Industry

Providers

(CB Insights)

In the past decade, two dozen cybersecurity startups have attained IPO or M&A values of $1 billion; 10 of them since 2017.[9]

Clients

PwC conducted a survey in 2020 and released it as “Global Digital Trust Insights 2021.” They asked 3,249 business and technology executives about their CISOs and the present and future of cybersecurity.[10] Some of their findings included:

  • Nearly all (96%) say they would adjust their cybersecurity strategy due to COVID-19.
  • Half are more likely now to consider cybersecurity in every business decision, up from 25% in 2019.
  • More (55%) are increasing cyber budgets than decreasing them in 2021.
  • However, most executives lack confidence that their cybersecurity budgets align with the most significant risks.

References