Difference between revisions of "INTA"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]] | [[Image:UnderConstruction.png]] | ||
| − | '''INTA''' | + | '''INTA''', or the '''International Trademark Association''', is a not-for-profit membership association established with the sole motive of providing the necessary support and advancement of trademarks and intellectual property with a view of conducting fair and effective commerce. It is headquartered in New York City and has offices in Brussels and Shanghai and representatives in Geneva, Mumbai and Washington D.C. |
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | The INTA was established in the year 1878 by 17 manufacturers and merchants. These merchants were of the opinion that there was a dire need | + | The INTA was established in the year 1878 by 17 manufacturers and merchants. These manufacturers and merchants were of the opinion that there was a dire need for an organization to help protect and promote the rights of trademark owners, formulate useful legislations, and provide help and encouragement to all endeavors contributing to the advancement of trademark rights. Today, the INTA consists of around 5,700 trademark owners, consisting of academics and professionals from more than 190 countries.<ref>[http://www.inta.org/About/Pages/Overview.aspx inta.org]</ref> |
== Member Organizations == | == Member Organizations == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Academic institutions, students and professors | * Academic institutions, students and professors | ||
* Trademark consultants | * Trademark consultants | ||
| − | * Intellectual property and general practice law firms <ref>[http://www.inta.org/Membership/Pages/Membership.aspx inta.org]INTA membership</ref> | + | * Intellectual property and general practice law firms<ref>[http://www.inta.org/Membership/Pages/Membership.aspx inta.org]INTA membership</ref> |
== Membership and Committees == | == Membership and Committees == | ||
| − | The committee members of INTA work on education, information, policy development | + | The committee members of INTA work on education, information, policy development, advocacy and other services. The term of these committees lasts for two years. The major committees of INTA include: |
| − | '''The Education and Services Group (ESG):''' This committee of INTA looks after | + | '''The Education and Services Group (ESG):''' This committee of INTA looks after services, including programs, member benefits, awards, and competitions, and is comprised of the following sub-committees, which carry out different functions: |
* Academic committee | * Academic committee | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* Young Practitioners Committee <ref>[http://www.inta.org/Committees/Pages/ESGGroup.aspx inta.org]ESG group</ref> | * Young Practitioners Committee <ref>[http://www.inta.org/Committees/Pages/ESGGroup.aspx inta.org]ESG group</ref> | ||
| − | '''Policy Development and Advocacy (PDA):''' This committee of the INTA provides all the necessary input and guidance on | + | '''Policy Development and Advocacy (PDA):''' This committee of the INTA provides all the necessary input and guidance on INTA policies and advocacy and consists of the following sub-committees: |
* Anticounterfeiting Committee (ACC) | * Anticounterfeiting Committee (ACC) | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
== INTA and ICANN == | == INTA and ICANN == | ||
| − | The INTA was critical | + | The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new [[gTLD]]s. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/drewsen-to-dengate-thrush-12oct10-en.pdf icann.org]</ref> |
| − | INTA had showed its willingness to support ICANN in an economic study aimed to | + | |
| + | INTA had showed its willingness, however, to support ICANN in an economic study aimed to research one of the most overreaching issues identified by ICANN. However, it demanded that the study should take place prior to the launch of any new gTLD program.<ref>[http://www.goldsteinreport.com/article.php?article=10138 goldsteinreport.com]</ref> In response to this, ICANN also accepted the INTA offer over helping ICANN in writing an economic report. <ref>[http://www.managingip.com/Article/2701823/Icann-accepts-INTA-offer-of-help.html managingip.com]</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| Line 67: | Line 68: | ||
[[category: glossary]] | [[category: glossary]] | ||
| − | + | [[category: Organizations]] | |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Revision as of 06:19, 2 April 2011
INTA, or the International Trademark Association, is a not-for-profit membership association established with the sole motive of providing the necessary support and advancement of trademarks and intellectual property with a view of conducting fair and effective commerce. It is headquartered in New York City and has offices in Brussels and Shanghai and representatives in Geneva, Mumbai and Washington D.C.
History
The INTA was established in the year 1878 by 17 manufacturers and merchants. These manufacturers and merchants were of the opinion that there was a dire need for an organization to help protect and promote the rights of trademark owners, formulate useful legislations, and provide help and encouragement to all endeavors contributing to the advancement of trademark rights. Today, the INTA consists of around 5,700 trademark owners, consisting of academics and professionals from more than 190 countries.[1]
Member Organizations
The INTA has more than 5700 member organizations based in more than 190 countries. These member organizations mostly comprise of the following:
- Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
- Service firms
- Major national and multinational corporations
- Academic institutions, students and professors
- Trademark consultants
- Intellectual property and general practice law firms[2]
Membership and Committees
The committee members of INTA work on education, information, policy development, advocacy and other services. The term of these committees lasts for two years. The major committees of INTA include:
The Education and Services Group (ESG): This committee of INTA looks after services, including programs, member benefits, awards, and competitions, and is comprised of the following sub-committees, which carry out different functions:
- Academic committee
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee (ADR)
- Government Officials Education & Training Committee
- In-House Practitioners Committee
- Law Firm Committee
- Leadership Development Committee
- Programs Committee
- Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition Committee
- Trademark Administrators Committee
- Young Practitioners Committee [3]
Policy Development and Advocacy (PDA): This committee of the INTA provides all the necessary input and guidance on INTA policies and advocacy and consists of the following sub-committees:
- Anticounterfeiting Committee (ACC)
- Emerging Issues Committee (EIC)
- Enforcement Committee (EC)
- Famous and Well-Known Marks Committee (FWKMC)
- Harmonization of Trademark Law and Practice Committee
- International Amicus Committee
- Internet Committee
- Legislation and Regulation Committee (LRC)
- Nontraditional Marks Committee
- Parallel Imports Committee (PIC)
- Related Rights Committee
- Trademark Office Practices Committee (TOPC) [4]
The Publishing (PUBS) Group: This committee conducts INTA's global trademark research and is also assigned with task of producing print titles, periodicals and products. It consists of the following:
- INTA Bulletin Committee
- Online Reference Committee
- Publications Committee
- The Trademark Reporter® Committee [5]
INTA and ICANN
The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new gTLDs. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them. [6]
INTA had showed its willingness, however, to support ICANN in an economic study aimed to research one of the most overreaching issues identified by ICANN. However, it demanded that the study should take place prior to the launch of any new gTLD program.[7] In response to this, ICANN also accepted the INTA offer over helping ICANN in writing an economic report. [8]