Difference between revisions of "Planet.ECO LLC"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
| keypeople      =
 
| keypeople      =
 
}}
 
}}
Planet.ECO LLC plans to be the next wave of consciousness by facilitating care to actions that protect the environment and combat climate change; while supporting economic and social prosperity.  They have created an Internet platform uniting users who care and want to translate their concern into action by connecting and engaging others to find goods and services that promote sustainability.{{Citation needed}}
+
Planet Dot Eco LLC plans to be the next wave of consciousness by facilitating care to actions that protect the environment and combat climate change; while supporting economic and social prosperity.  They have created an Internet platform uniting users who care and want to translate their concern into action by connecting and engaging others to find goods and services that promote sustainability.{{Citation needed}}
 +
 
 +
==New gTLDs==
 +
Planet Dot Eco is one of the four applicants for the [[.eco]] string as part of the [[New gTLD Program]]. The company failed both its technical and financial questions but is eligible for further review.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14288-failures-mount-up-as-icann-releases-penultimate-week-of-ie-results Failures Mount Up as ICANN Releases Penultimate Week of IE results, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
 +
 
 +
Planet Dot Eco, LLC is the trademark holder of .eco. The company filed an infringement case against [[Big Room Inc.]] and [[Dot Eco LLC]] on March 2, 2012. The complainant asked the court to order Big Room and Dot Eco LLC to stop submitting further documentation and withdraw their application for the .eco string with ICANN. Dot Eco LLC responded to the complaint with an argument that the trademark was obtained illegally by Planet.eco and it should be cancelled by the court. Dot Eco also argued that the complainant is is trying to prevent competition. On the other hand, Big Room filed a motion to dismiss because of lack of jurisdiction. <ref>
 +
[http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trademark-lawsuits/california-central-district-court/91343/planet-eco-llc-v-big-room-inc-et-al/summary/ Planet.Eco LLC v. Big Room Inc. et al]</ref> <ref>[http://www.remarksblog.com/internet/as-gtld-window-closes-legal-disputes-heat/ AS GTLD WINDOW CLOSES, LEGAL DISPUTES HEAT UP: RIVAL.ECO APPLICANTS SPAR IN CALIFORNIA]</ref> <ref>
 +
[http://domainincite.com/three-way-legal-fight-over-eco-breaks-out/ Three-way legal fight over .eco breaks out]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 17:05, 2 October 2013

Planetdoteco logo.jpg
Type: Limited Liability Corporation
Industry: Web Hosting, Digital Content and Consulting
Founded: 2011
Founder(s): Jean William
Moses Boone
Headquarters: Stamford, Connecticut
Country: USA
Businesses: Doteco.com
Website: PlanetDotEco.com
Facebook: Planet Dot Eco
LinkedIn: Planet Dot Eco
Twitter: TwitterIcon.png@planetdoteco

Planet Dot Eco LLC plans to be the next wave of consciousness by facilitating care to actions that protect the environment and combat climate change; while supporting economic and social prosperity. They have created an Internet platform uniting users who care and want to translate their concern into action by connecting and engaging others to find goods and services that promote sustainability.[citation needed]

New gTLDs

Planet Dot Eco is one of the four applicants for the .eco string as part of the New gTLD Program. The company failed both its technical and financial questions but is eligible for further review.[1]

Planet Dot Eco, LLC is the trademark holder of .eco. The company filed an infringement case against Big Room Inc. and Dot Eco LLC on March 2, 2012. The complainant asked the court to order Big Room and Dot Eco LLC to stop submitting further documentation and withdraw their application for the .eco string with ICANN. Dot Eco LLC responded to the complaint with an argument that the trademark was obtained illegally by Planet.eco and it should be cancelled by the court. Dot Eco also argued that the complainant is is trying to prevent competition. On the other hand, Big Room filed a motion to dismiss because of lack of jurisdiction. [2] [3] [4]

References