Registrar Accreditation Agreement

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) is, simply stated, the contract that governs the relationship between ICANN and its accredited registrars.

History

The RAA was originally one of several agreements between ICANN, the United States Department of Commerce (DOC), and Network Solutions, with the intent of enhancing and solidifying the competition between .com, .net, and .org TLD registrars. These agreements were tentatively announced on September 28, 1999, and, after oral and written public comments, were revised and then adopted by ICANN on November 4, 1999. At the time, registrars were allowed to take up the new agreement in place of their old agreement.[1]

On May 21, 2009, ICANN approved revisions to the RAA, which were intended to clarify the responsibilities of the registrars and the rights of the registrants. These revisions came about in response to market development and the significant growth in the number of accredited registrars and domain name registrations, as per the suggestion of a comprehensive review of the RAA and the Accreditation process called for in March 2007 by then-ICANN CEO Paul Twomey. This new RAA applies to all the new registrars, registrars that voluntarily adopt the contract prior the renewal date and to registrars that renew after the approval date.[2] But, following this revision, there were still those who thought the RAA did not do enough to address public concerns. Thus the RAA-DT was formed, made up of members of the GNSO and the At-Large Community, to propose further revisions.

On March 2010, Law enforcement officials particularly the Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) in United Kingdom and the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) asked ICANN to implement procedures to curb incidence of abuse in the domain name system (DNS). The two agencies proposed some measures to be incorporated in the RAA such as stronger verification of registrants' name, address, phone number, e-mail address and method of payment for domain names.[3]

In October, 2011, at the ICANN 42 meeting in Dakar, Senegal, the ICANN Board approved the immediate negotiation between ICANN and Registrar Negotiation Team regarding the proposed amendments to the RAA. The amendment topics which include law enforcement, registrant protection and internet stability were recommended by the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)and the GNSOWorking Group. The result of the amendment negotiations will be considered by ICANN during its meeting in Costa Rica on March 2012.[4]

On December 13th, ICANN announced an open comment period on the Preliminary GNSO Issue Report regarding the RAA amendments, to close one month later. Comments on the prelininary report will be considered for the Final Issue Report, to be presented to the GNSO council following the closure of the comment period. All this has been in anticipation of the topic to discussed at the ICANN 43 meeting in Costa Rica, at the request of the Board.[5]

Prior to the ICANN Meeting in Costa Rica, the RAA Negotiation Team submitted a summary of the negotiations on the RAA on March 1. 2012. The RAA Negotiation Team and ICANN indicated to nearly reaching an agreement on majority of the topics discussed during the 13 negotiation sessions both principles and language. You can find the Summary of RAA Negotiations here.

Contents of RAA

General Obligations of ICANN:

ICANN, under the RAA, is obliged to carry out its functions in an open manner and is to promote intensive competition between registrars. It should also not apply standards, procedures, or policies to single out registrars for disparate treatment unless it has a reasonable cause.

General Obligations of the Registrars:

Registrars are obliged to comply with all related ICANN-adopted policies. The Registrars are also obliged not to restrain competition.[6]

Members of the RAA Drafting Team

Some of the members of the RAA Drafting Team include:

The complete RAA-DT members list is available here

RAA Negotiation Topics

The priority topics discussed during the negotiation sessions falls under four categories which include:[7]

  • Registrar Obligations/Duties
  • Privacy and Proxy Services/Resellers
  • Whois Data
  • Contract Administration

References