Difference between revisions of "Registries Stakeholder Group"
(→Interest Groups: +two cols) |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
The current/active Interest Groups and their members are: | The current/active Interest Groups and their members are: | ||
| − | + | <div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2"> | |
'''Affirmation of Commitments (AoC)''' | '''Affirmation of Commitments (AoC)''' | ||
*Accountability and Transparency Review Team | *Accountability and Transparency Review Team | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
*[[Pat Kane]], [[Verisign]] | *[[Pat Kane]], [[Verisign]] | ||
*[[Ken Stubbs]], [[Afilias]]<ref>[http://www.gtldregistries.org/about-us About RySG]</ref> | *[[Ken Stubbs]], [[Afilias]]<ref>[http://www.gtldregistries.org/about-us About RySG]</ref> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
==Registry Constituency== | ==Registry Constituency== | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 10 July 2014
The Registries Stakeholder Group (also Registry Stakeholder Group, RySG, or gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group) is a Stakeholder Group within the Contracted Parties House under ICANN's GNSO. It represents the interests of the gTLD Registries currently under contract with ICANN and provides them with gTLD Registry Services. It also facilitates communication among the gTLD Registries and voices the views of the Registry Constituency to the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board of Directors, with a special emphasis on ICANN consensus policies, which relate to the technical reliability, interoperability and the stable operation of the Internet or DNS.[1]
Feedback
The most current and contentious debate between the Registry Stakeholder group and ICANN has been over the Registry Agreement related to New gTLD operators. Many members can be seen to represent not only their own applications but those of their clients, though forthcoming registry operators have also formed the separate New TLD Applicant Group within ICANN.
The RySG seems to be most strongly opposed to ICANN's attempt to integrate a "unilateral right to amend" into the Registry Agreement. The point would give the ICANN Board to amend the Agreement with a 2/3 majority vote, under the current registry agreement special amendments need the approval of registries representing two-thirds of all registry fees paid to ICANN before they became law. The RySG claims that ICANN is essentially doing away with the bottom-up multistakeholder model in favor of a restructuring that does not rely on GNSO policy development.[2] ICANN and its defenders claim that the change is necessary given the large amount of new registries to be created and prepare for any future Registry Agreements, where getting hundreds of operators to agree will be near impossible as evidenced by the 18 months spent working on the most recent Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). The RAA put forth by ICANN around the same time as the Registry Agreement has an identical "unilateral right to amend" clause.[3]
Organization and Membership of the RySG
The membership of the RySG is open to all TLD Registries. Registries must apply for membership via the application process. Every Registry needs to identify a Voting Delegate and, if desired, alternate Voting Delegates.
Funding
Funding for the RySG is provided by its members. Every member joining the Group needs to pay an initial membership fee as well as a fixed annual membership fee and a variable annual membership fee as per the schedule of the RySG. A member loses its voting rights if it fails to pay the fees as previously invoiced within thirty days after a written notice of non-payment.[4]
Structure of the RySG
Executive Committee
The RySG consists of an Executive Committee, which is comprised of a Chair, an Alternate Chair, and a Treasurer. The main responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to facilitate policy coordination meetings, to support the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board, as requested by ICANN, and to manage and administer elections.
- Keith Drazek, Verisign, Chair
- Paul Diaz, PIR, Vice Chair
- Michael Palage, Treasurer
- Ken Stubbs, Afilias, Assistant Treasurer
- David Maher, PIR, Immediate Past Chair
Secretariat
GNSO Representatives
The following individuals represent the Registry Constituency and its views within the larger Generic Name Supporting Organization:
- Jonathan Robinson, European region, term expires end of the 2015 annual meeting
- Ching Chiao, Asia Pacific region, term expires end of the 2014 annual meeting
- Bret Fausett, North America region, term expires end of the 2014 annual meeting
Registrars Stakeholder Group (RrSG) Constituency Liaison
ICANN Nominating Committee Representative
Interest Groups
For the sake of collaborating on vital issues of common interest within the RySG, members self-organize themselves into different Interest Groups. The main responsibilities of these specific Interest Groups is to nominate candidates for GNSO Council Representatives, participate in the GNSO policy development processes, and develop position statements with special emphasis on the ICANN consensus policies.
The current/active Interest Groups and their members are:
Affirmation of Commitments (AoC)
- Accountability and Transparency Review Team
- Brian Cute, Chair
- Accountability and Transparency Review Team Focus Group for ATRT Recommendations 15, 16 and 17
- Whois Review Team
- Security, Stability and Resiliency Review Team
Anti-Phishing Work Group
- David Maher, PIR
Fake Renewal Notices Drafting Team
- Paul Diaz, PIR
- Ken Stubbs, Afilias
ICANN Academy Working Group
- Chuck Gomes, Verisign
- Guidelines Review Committee
- IDN ccTLD Fast Track
- IDN gTLD Quick Start Initiative
- Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)
- Edmon Chung, DotAsia
Internationalized Registration Data Work Group
Inter-Registrar Transfers Policy Working Group
- Eric Brown, Neustar
- Barbara Knight, Verisign
- Roy Dykes, Neustar
- Paul Diaz, PIR
Lock of Domain Name Subject to UDRP PDP Working Group
- David Maher, PIR
- Barbara Knight, Verisign
- Sheri Falco, ICM Registry
Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) Implementation Review Team
- Will Shorter, Verisign
- Michael Palage, DotCoop
RAA Amendments Drafting Team
Registrar Accreditation Agreement Onboarding Inprovements Working Group
- Roy Dykes, Neustar, Lead
- Barbara Knight, Verisign
- David Maher, PIR
- Paul Diaz, PIR
- Carolyn Hoover, Dot Coop
- Michael Palage, Dot Coop
- Dirk Krischenowski, Dot Berlin (Observer member)
- Jon Nevett, Donuts (Observer member)
Registries Communication Practices Working Group
Registry Constituency
Prior to the GNSO restructuring, the Registry Stakeholder Group was known as the Registry Constituency. It was comprised of the registry operators for the .net, .org, .name, .com, .pro, .museum, .aero, .coop and .info gTLDs, which were the only TLDs at the time.[7]
Affiliated Stakeholder Groups
Due to the structure of RySG and ICANN following the start of the New gTLD Program, applicants who would potentially become registries if their applications were approved were allowed to join RySG as Observer members. To better represent their own unique perspectives within ICANN, they formed their own Stakeholder Group, the New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (or NTAG], organized as a Stakeholder Group under RySG. There are smaller groups inside of NTAG as well, created to better represent their members: the Community Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (CTAG) and the Geographic Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (GeoTAG). At the moment, these are much more informal groups.[8]
References
- ↑ RySG About Us
- ↑ Comments Base Agreement 05Feb2013, Forum.ICANN.org Retrieved 1 April 2013
- ↑ ICANN Seeks More Power Over New gTLD Registries, DomainIncite.com 1 April 2013
- ↑ gnso.icann.org
- ↑ RySG About Us
- ↑ About RySG
- ↑ gTLD statement; October 30, 2002
- ↑ RySG Biweekly Conference Call, 14 November 2012