Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 bytes removed ,  11 years ago
Line 46: Line 46:  
You can find the UDRP Panel decisions related to the 22 domain names [http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisionsx/index-gtld.html '''here''']
 
You can find the UDRP Panel decisions related to the 22 domain names [http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisionsx/index-gtld.html '''here''']
   −
==Request for ICANN Investigation on NAF UDRP Decisions==
+
==ICA Requests Investigation on NAF UDRP Decisions==
 
On February 2012, the Internet Commerce Association ([[ICA]]) sent a letter to ICANN requesting for an immediate investigation regarding the UDRP arbitration practices of the [[National Arbitration Forum]] (NAF) due to its recent ruling on two cases.<ref>[http://internetcommerce.org/NAF_UDRP_FAIL ICANN Should Investigate NAF’s UDRP Practices]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/ica-demands-probe-of-shoddy-udrp-decisions/ ICA demands probe of “shoddy” UDRP decisions]</ref> The first case was the Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman, wherein NAF ruled the transfer of the domain name hardwareresources.org to the complainant due to its argument that the domain name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark HR Hardware Resources and the defendant failed to respond to the complaint.<ref>[http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1423229.htm NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman}</ref>
 
On February 2012, the Internet Commerce Association ([[ICA]]) sent a letter to ICANN requesting for an immediate investigation regarding the UDRP arbitration practices of the [[National Arbitration Forum]] (NAF) due to its recent ruling on two cases.<ref>[http://internetcommerce.org/NAF_UDRP_FAIL ICANN Should Investigate NAF’s UDRP Practices]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/ica-demands-probe-of-shoddy-udrp-decisions/ ICA demands probe of “shoddy” UDRP decisions]</ref> The first case was the Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman, wherein NAF ruled the transfer of the domain name hardwareresources.org to the complainant due to its argument that the domain name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark HR Hardware Resources and the defendant failed to respond to the complaint.<ref>[http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1423229.htm NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman}</ref>
  
9,082

edits

Navigation menu