Difference between revisions of "User:Saassoln"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# [[ACP]]- Not enough information, instead posted [[VoIP]] - CP | # [[ACP]]- Not enough information, instead posted [[VoIP]] - CP | ||
# [[ADR]]-CP - see comments on talk page.'''<font color="red">edited</font>''' | # [[ADR]]-CP - see comments on talk page.'''<font color="red">edited</font>''' | ||
| − | # [[AFA]]-CP - structure section unclear. what does the office mean?'''<font color="red">edited</font>''' added new | + | # [[AFA]]-CP - structure section unclear. what does the office mean?'''<font color="red">edited</font>''' added a new section "partners" |
# [[AFNIC]]-CP - Attempted to edit, but many sections of article are unclear. | # [[AFNIC]]-CP - Attempted to edit, but many sections of article are unclear. | ||
# [[AFTLD]]-CP | # [[AFTLD]]-CP | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 8 April 2011
Batch 1
- ACP- Not enough information, instead posted VoIP - CP
- ADR-CP - see comments on talk page.edited
- AFA-CP - structure section unclear. what does the office mean?edited added a new section "partners"
- AFNIC-CP - Attempted to edit, but many sections of article are unclear.
- AFTLD-CP
- AIRA- Not enough information, instead posted APTLD - CP - The section about the JPA is confusing.
- APRAM-CP - history section a little unclear. For example, what does this mean: "APRAM was born mostly from a conjunction of the wishes of designs (patent attorneys, lawyers and industry) and professional trademarks"?
- APNG-CP
- BGC-CP
- BE
- CAIP-CP - the end of objectives and the first two bullets in code of conduct are unclear
- CDT-CP
- CIGREF-CP
- CNRI-CP
- CORE-MoU-CP
- CCT-CP
- DARPA-CP - DARPA and ICANN section is unclear, especially towards the end.
- DOC-CP. How does the DOC relate to ICANN?edited
- DeNIC -Not enough information, instead posted ITU - CP
- DAG-CP
- DT-CP - The drafting team process section is unclear
- DRP-CP
- EC-CP - EC and ICANN section is unclear
- ECTA-CP
- eCOMLAC-CP
- ENRED -Not enough information, instead posted DNSO - CP
- ETNO-CP
- ETSI-CP - strategic goals section unclear
- EuroInternet-Not enough information, instead posting IGF - CP
- EuroISPA-CP
- EOI-CP
- FCC-CP. Strategic goals section is unclear.edited
- FOA-CP
- FF
- FFWG
- FAG-CP - the changes section seems irrelevant if we don't know what the changes are being applied to. Can you make a section explaining the different modules?
- GA-CP
- GCOT-CP
- GPML-CP this article could use more clarification. It's not clear how the GMPL and New TLDs are related.
- GII-CP
- HSTLD-CP
- IAB-CP
- IAHC-CP. Some parts of article are unclear, especially in the introduction. Article needs more sources.
- ICC-CP
- IESG-CP. The role section requires more clarification. We need to know what the internet standards process is before we can understand how it related to IESG.
- INTA-CP. The last paragraph needs more clarification. What is the "overreaching issue" being discussed?
- IOPS.ORG-Not enough information, instead posted LACTLD - CP
- iPOC-CP
- JPA-CP
- URL-CP - Article is unclear.
Batch 2
- JIG
- KENIC
- LSE
- MARQUES
- MoU
- MPAA
- MOPO
- NANC
- NANP
- NSF
- NSI
- NTIA
- NCSG
- NCPH
- NOIF
- OECD
- OSC
- OARC
- PAB
- POC
- PEDNR
- PPSC
- PDEPDP
- PDP-WT
- PDDM
- PDDRP
- RFC
- RAA
- RyC
- RAP WG
- RySG
- RrSG
- SRS- Article stub, needs to be built
- SIC
- SG
- SOI
- STI
- STI-DT
- TCP
- TDRP
- TzNIC
- TIX
- TOR
- TMC
- TDG
- USPTO
- URSS
- UPU
- USCIB
- VI
Batch 3 (coming)
These terms (both glossary terms and company terms) are frequently linked on our site, though they remain without their own page. Creating articles for them will create the wonderful web of information we're looking for.
Check out the pages that link to these terms by going to Most Linked to Pages and then clicking on the number of links (in blue parentheses) next to the term in question. Reading these first may provide a greater context and direction to go for the new page. Good luck!