Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the Week 2016/31"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) m |
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''[[Reverse Domain Name Hijacking]]''', also known as Reverse Domain Hijacking or Reverse Cybersquatting, involves attempting to use trademark protection mechanisms, such as [[ICANN]]'s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy ([[UDRP]]) or the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act ([[ACPA]]), in bad faith to acquire a domain name when the owner has legitimate rights to it. Reverse domain name hijacking is usually attempted by large companies that can afford expensive legal fees. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 14:18, 28 July 2016
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, also known as Reverse Domain Hijacking or Reverse Cybersquatting, involves attempting to use trademark protection mechanisms, such as ICANN's Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) or the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), in bad faith to acquire a domain name when the owner has legitimate rights to it. Reverse domain name hijacking is usually attempted by large companies that can afford expensive legal fees.