Talk:.gop: Difference between revisions
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Loupgarous (talk | contribs) Thanked Dustin for his time on this. |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Not notable enough to justify inclusion== | ==Not notable enough to justify inclusion== | ||
Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. [[User:Dustin Phillips|Dustin Phillips]] ([[User talk:Dustin Phillips|talk]]) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT) | Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. [[User:Dustin Phillips|Dustin Phillips]] ([[User talk:Dustin Phillips|talk]]) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT) | ||
:That's precisely why I asked. Different wikis have different criteria for notability, and even within wikipedia there can be wide differences of opinion. Thanks for your time [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:26, 23 October 2016
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses. Is this notable enough to include in the article .gop? Loupgarous (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
Not notable enough to justify inclusion
Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. Dustin Phillips (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT)
- That's precisely why I asked. Different wikis have different criteria for notability, and even within wikipedia there can be wide differences of opinion. Thanks for your time Loupgarous (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (PDT)