At-Large Summit: Difference between revisions
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Working Groups=== | ===Working Groups=== | ||
Five working groups were formed to draft and finalize a Summit Declaration to the [[ICANN Board]]. The five topics were | Five working groups were formed to draft and finalize a Summit Declaration to the [[ICANN Board]].<ref>https://atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/correspondence-05mar09-en.pdf</ref> The subjects for the working groups were chosen via a survey of the entire [[At-Large Community]] between December 2008 and January 2009. The summit participants were assigned to the working group that they selected as of most interest to them, and then the groups were balanced regionally and according to language needs. All five working groups began working together in February 2009 in advance of the Summit and met twice during the summit to finalize their statements. | ||
The five topics were: | |||
====At-Large engagement in ICANN==== | |||
The general sentiment was that participation was poor and there was much room for improvement. | The general sentiment was that participation was poor and there was much room for improvement. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! Issue !! Recommendations | |||
|- | |||
| IDN POLICY || Fund a timely public information campaign in collaboration with ALSes in the next budget. ICANN should consult ALSes to reach communities and end-users. | |||
|- | |||
| GNSO || cultivate specialists on GNSO issues in At-Large Community | |||
|- | |||
| LOCAL LEVEL || A face-to-face At-Large meeting in each region every year to identify and discuss issues; gather community input in advance, using local radio or SMS | |||
|- | |||
| ICANN MEETINGS || more professional remote participation systems (telephonic, chat interface, video streaming), especially for vision- and hearing-impaired users. ICANN should provide opportunities for regional groups to meet on the horizontal level to feed back into the international level. PDP will improve by considering regional differences in views comprehensively. | |||
|- | |||
| GLOBAL OUTREACH || differentiated approaches to manage and implement ICANN activities; ALAC must engage early in SO PDP to reflect end-users; ALAC and the Fellowship committee should collaborate to enhance outreach; ALSes need support in providing local users’ feedback (information, sensitization, training seminars on ICANN issues on radio, TV) | |||
|- | |||
| TRANSLATION || Continue to apply the multilingualism best practices of other international organizations; ALSes should be actively involved in translation; RALOs help identify the documents to be translated for ICANN | |||
|- | |||
| TRAVEL SUPPORT || At-Large participants need full travel support to ICANN meetings, including visa costs; start the travel process earlier and local hosts should help with visas; meeting planners should consider affordability as a criterion; deliver per diem remuneration for timely access; avoid accommodating volunteer ALAC members and representatives from ALSes in remote, low-quality hotels; for regional meetings, all members should receive travel and expense support; amend the Rules and Procedures for Travel Support to comply with the proposals from the 2008 ALAC Statement to the ICANN Board | |||
|} | |||
====The future structure and governance of ICANN==== | |||
====New gTLDs including IDN gTLDs==== | |||
====Transparency and accountability of ICANN==== | |||
====Security issues within ICANN's mandate==== | |||
==References== | |||
==ATLAS II== | ==ATLAS II== |
Revision as of 22:10, 10 December 2020
The At-Large Summit (ATLAS) is a gathering of the representatives of individual Internet users participating in ICANN. There have been three ATLASes.
ATLAS I[edit | edit source]
ATLAS I was the first-ever gathering of the representatives of individual Internet users participating in ICANN. Organized as part of ICANN 34 in Mexico City, ATLAS I featured two general sessions for all participants as well as thematic sessions and workshops on issues led by At-Large community members.
Working Groups[edit | edit source]
Five working groups were formed to draft and finalize a Summit Declaration to the ICANN Board.[1] The subjects for the working groups were chosen via a survey of the entire At-Large Community between December 2008 and January 2009. The summit participants were assigned to the working group that they selected as of most interest to them, and then the groups were balanced regionally and according to language needs. All five working groups began working together in February 2009 in advance of the Summit and met twice during the summit to finalize their statements. The five topics were:
At-Large engagement in ICANN[edit | edit source]
The general sentiment was that participation was poor and there was much room for improvement.
Issue | Recommendations |
---|---|
IDN POLICY | Fund a timely public information campaign in collaboration with ALSes in the next budget. ICANN should consult ALSes to reach communities and end-users. |
GNSO | cultivate specialists on GNSO issues in At-Large Community |
LOCAL LEVEL | A face-to-face At-Large meeting in each region every year to identify and discuss issues; gather community input in advance, using local radio or SMS |
ICANN MEETINGS | more professional remote participation systems (telephonic, chat interface, video streaming), especially for vision- and hearing-impaired users. ICANN should provide opportunities for regional groups to meet on the horizontal level to feed back into the international level. PDP will improve by considering regional differences in views comprehensively. |
GLOBAL OUTREACH | differentiated approaches to manage and implement ICANN activities; ALAC must engage early in SO PDP to reflect end-users; ALAC and the Fellowship committee should collaborate to enhance outreach; ALSes need support in providing local users’ feedback (information, sensitization, training seminars on ICANN issues on radio, TV) |
TRANSLATION | Continue to apply the multilingualism best practices of other international organizations; ALSes should be actively involved in translation; RALOs help identify the documents to be translated for ICANN |
TRAVEL SUPPORT | At-Large participants need full travel support to ICANN meetings, including visa costs; start the travel process earlier and local hosts should help with visas; meeting planners should consider affordability as a criterion; deliver per diem remuneration for timely access; avoid accommodating volunteer ALAC members and representatives from ALSes in remote, low-quality hotels; for regional meetings, all members should receive travel and expense support; amend the Rules and Procedures for Travel Support to comply with the proposals from the 2008 ALAC Statement to the ICANN Board |
The future structure and governance of ICANN[edit | edit source]
New gTLDs including IDN gTLDs[edit | edit source]
Transparency and accountability of ICANN[edit | edit source]
Security issues within ICANN's mandate[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
ATLAS II[edit | edit source]
The Second At-Large Summit, or ATLAS II, was held in London in conjunction with ICANN London. The summit brought together representatives from various At-Large Structures to learn and debate ICANN policies, share information, and experience an ICANN meeting. The attendees represent Internet end-users, and many had never experienced an ICANN meeting before. The goal of the meeting was to discuss, reach consensus, and draft reports on five issues: 1) the Future of Multistakeholderism, 2) the Globalization of ICANN, 3) Global Internet: the User Perspective, 4) ICANN Transparency and Accountability, and 5) At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN.[2]
ATLAS III[edit | edit source]
- ↑ https://atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/correspondence-05mar09-en.pdf
- ↑ At-Large Community to Convene in London for ATLAS II ICANN.org; Retrieved 10 July 2014