Line 96: |
Line 96: |
| |- | | |- |
| | Accountability || Immediately update the website, which is the most outdate of all SO/ACs || CcNSO Council should adhere to council practice guidelines || Future Independent Examiners should have access to archived mailing lists and be able to join as an observer to the mailing lists<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf Ccnso Review Report Recommendations (p.p. 59-62)]</ref> | | | Accountability || Immediately update the website, which is the most outdate of all SO/ACs || CcNSO Council should adhere to council practice guidelines || Future Independent Examiners should have access to archived mailing lists and be able to join as an observer to the mailing lists<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf Ccnso Review Report Recommendations (p.p. 59-62)]</ref> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | ===Review Working Party Response=== |
| + | {| class="wikitable" |
| + | ! Recommendation !! Y/N !! RWP reason/action !! However... |
| + | |- |
| + | | Communications Materials || N || The pool of next-generation ccTLD managers is very limited; it is not worth the effort || Will make an "outreach and engagement framework" |
| + | |- |
| + | | 1/3 quota || N || Too limiting and members rely on their employers to be able to participate || |
| + | |- |
| + | | Volunteer roster || N || Tried it before; didn't work || |
| + | |- |
| + | | Standardize process for nominating/appointing WG chairs || N || Only an issue of perception; members know about the process || |
| + | |- |
| + | | IANA Team || N || Already implemented || |
| + | |- |
| + | | Limit consecutive council terms || N || Too hard to find other councilor candidates || |
| + | |- |
| + | | More participation at ccNSO Meetings Programme Committee || N || Already offer virtual meetings || |
| + | |- |
| + | | Real-Time scribing || Y || Will continue to ask for the service || It is up to ICANN |
| + | |- |
| + | | Improve onboarding || Y || Will continue to ask for the service || It is up to ICANN |
| + | |- |
| + | | Better mentorship program || Y || Will begin thinking about a framework || |
| + | |- |
| + | | Newcomer resources || Y || Depends on improvement to website || Difficult and not urgent |
| + | |- |
| + | | Update website || Y || Will send a letter to [[ICANN Board]]; top priority || It is up to ICANN |
| + | |- |
| + | | Adhere to guidelines || N || Council already does; the agenda and decision list are published in time || |
| + | |- |
| + | | IE access to mailing list || Y || Depends on information shared || Only for verification purposes<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-faiip-07jul20-en.pdf CCNSO Feasibility Assessment and Implementation Plan]</ref> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |