ICANN 71: Difference between revisions

Line 12:

}}

'''ICANN 71''' was a [[Policy Forum]] that was held from June 14 to June 17, 2021, virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It was supposed to have taken place in The Hague, the Netherlands.

'''ICANN 71''' was a [[Policy Forum]] that was held from June 14 to June 17, 2021, virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It was supposed to have taken place in The Hague, the Netherlands. Although there was a prominent, well-attended plenary concerning [[ICANN]]'s [[Multistakeholder Model]], the vast majority of sessions were dedicated to either ICANN's response to regulatory developments in Europe or [[DNS Abuse]] mitigation.

==Meetings==

===Plenaries===

====Multistakeholder Model Evolution====

Line 31:

Line 30:

====Impact of Regulatory Developments====

The conversation was supposed to be general but time and again the questions drove the dialogue back to the [[GDPR]]. In its constellation, speakers addressed:

*To increase [[Cybersecurity]] in Europe, the Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market For Digital Services ([[DSA|Digital Services Act]]), the [[EC]] proposals (to correct or)enhance the GDPR, Proposal for a Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union ([[NIS2]]), [[SSAD]], and how to go beyond ICANN's [[Contracted Party House]] <br/>

* The effort to increase [[Cybersecurity]] in Europe with the Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market For Digital Services ([[DSA|Digital Services Act]]), the [[EC]] proposals (to correct or) enhance the GDPR, Proposal for a Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union ([[NIS2]]), [[SSAD]], and how to go beyond ICANN's [[Contracted Party House]] <br/>

::For instance, [[Volker Greimann]] asked, "Why is NIS2 focussing on [[DNS]] as opposed to hosting, e.g, where the content is? Why are Hosters not subjected to the same requirements?"

*[[Paul Muchene]] and [[Jeff Neuman]] had a side discussion [[RDAP]]. Paul: doesn’t it already do what these proposals seek? Jeff: RDAP is a technical protocol. It is policy agnostic.”

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 }}
-'''ICANN 71''' was a [[Policy Forum]] that was held from June 14 to June 17, 2021, virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It was supposed to have taken place in The Hague, the Netherlands.
+'''ICANN 71''' was a [[Policy Forum]] that was held from June 14 to June 17, 2021, virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It was supposed to have taken place in The Hague, the Netherlands. Although there was a prominent, well-attended plenary concerning [[ICANN]]'s [[Multistakeholder Model]], the vast majority of sessions were dedicated to either ICANN's response to regulatory developments in Europe or [[DNS Abuse]] mitigation.
 ==Meetings==
 ===Plenaries===
 ====Multistakeholder Model Evolution====
@@ Line 31: / Line 30: @@
 ====Impact of Regulatory Developments====
 The conversation was supposed to be general but time and again the questions drove the dialogue back to the [[GDPR]]. In its constellation, speakers addressed:
-*To increase [[Cybersecurity]] in Europe, the Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market For Digital Services ([[DSA|Digital Services Act]]), the [[EC]] proposals (to correct or)enhance the GDPR, Proposal for a Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union ([[NIS2]]), [[SSAD]], and how to go beyond ICANN's [[Contracted Party House]] <br/>
+* The effort to increase [[Cybersecurity]] in Europe with the Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market For Digital Services ([[DSA|Digital Services Act]]), the [[EC]] proposals (to correct or) enhance the GDPR, Proposal for a Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union ([[NIS2]]), [[SSAD]], and how to go beyond ICANN's [[Contracted Party House]] <br/>
 ::For instance, [[Volker Greimann]] asked, "Why is NIS2 focussing on [[DNS]] as opposed to hosting, e.g, where the content is? Why are Hosters not subjected to the same requirements?"
 *[[Paul Muchene]] and [[Jeff Neuman]] had a side discussion [[RDAP]]. Paul: doesn’t it already do what these proposals seek? Jeff: RDAP is a technical protocol. It is policy agnostic.”