Second NomCom Organizational Review: Difference between revisions

Line 96:

** Clarify the definition and desire for independent directors; and

** Designate three seats for independent directors.<ref name="recslides" />

At the presentation, many current NomCom members commented that they largely agreed with the recommendations of the Analysis Group.<ref name="61audio" /> One of the points of conversation was the meaning of "independence." The reviewers noted in their presentation that the term has a myriad of definitions in the ICANN community, and that they were unable to find a concrete and specific definition as it related to directors of the board.<ref name="61audio" /> [[George Sadowsky]], speaking on his own behalf, noted that the definition was a legal one, and that opinions on what it meant were perhaps not as important. He also mentioned that the structure of the NomCom was based on an organizational map of ICANN from 2003, and that a recomposition was long overdue.<ref name="61audio" /> [[Jonathan Cohen]] agreed with George Sandusky that the structural composition of the NomCom was a pertinent and important point.<ref name="61audio" />

After [[ICANN 61]], the draft report was published for public comment on March 27, 2018.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en ICANN.org - Public comment proceeding, NomCom2 Draft Final Report], March 27, 2018</ref>

===Public Comment on Draft Report===

Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the recommendations as a whole.

==References==

[[Category:Organizational Reviews]]

@@ Line 96: / Line 96: @@
 ** Clarify the definition and desire for independent directors; and
 ** Designate three seats for independent directors.<ref name="recslides" />
+At the presentation, many current NomCom members commented that they largely agreed with the recommendations of the Analysis Group.<ref name="61audio" /> One of the points of conversation was the meaning of "independence." The reviewers noted in their presentation that the term has a myriad of definitions in the ICANN community, and that they were unable to find a concrete and specific definition as it related to directors of the board.<ref name="61audio" /> [[George Sadowsky]], speaking on his own behalf, noted that the definition was a legal one, and that opinions on what it meant were perhaps not as important. He also mentioned that the structure of the NomCom was based on an organizational map of ICANN from 2003, and that a recomposition was long overdue.<ref name="61audio" /> [[Jonathan Cohen]] agreed with George Sandusky that the structural composition of the NomCom was a pertinent and important point.<ref name="61audio" />
+After [[ICANN 61]], the draft report was published for public comment on March 27, 2018.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en ICANN.org - Public comment proceeding, NomCom2 Draft Final Report], March 27, 2018</ref>
+===Public Comment on Draft Report===
+Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the recommendations as a whole.
 ==References==
 [[Category:Organizational Reviews]]