Second NomCom Organizational Review: Difference between revisions

Line 102:

===Public Comment on Draft Report===

Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the recommendations as a whole.

Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the Analysis Group's work and recommendations as a whole. [[Mark Seiden]] lamented the lack of fine-grained attention in the review to policy-making by each NomCom. As an example, he noted that the current NomCom did not routinely publish its decision-making or proposed changes to process for public comment. This, and other transparency issues, indicated to Seiden that the "secrecy" issues surrounding the NomCom remained. [[Ole Jacobsen]] commented that there should be better connection and communication between the different NomCom cycles, so that continuity and transparency could be strengthened. [[Tom Barrett]] solicited comments on how the NomCom might better address and support the Empowered Community model. [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]] agreed that the Empowered Community had placed additional obligations on the NomCom, as with all organizations. However, she noted too that there was not yet a full-term NomCom process within the post-EC world, and that this might be something to readdress in the future.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/NomCom+Review+Working+Party+Meetings?preview=/66078095/84214267/NomCom%20Webinar_10APR18_mp3%20audio.mp3 NomCom2 Archive - Audio Recording of Draft Report Webinar], April 10, 2018</ref>

The draft final report also received ten written comments from ICANN organizations and constituencies during the public comment period.<ref>[https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/2018q2/date.html NomCom2 Listserv Archive - Public Comments on Draft Final Report], April 12 - May 10, 2018</ref>

==References==

[[Category:Organizational Reviews]]

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 ===Public Comment on Draft Report===
-Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the recommendations as a whole.
+Public comment was solicited at the [[ICANN 61]] presentation, and at a subsequent webinar held on April 10, 2018.<ref name="drwebinar">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+for+Draft+Final+Report+-+Call+Details NomCom2 Workspace - Webinar: Draft Final Report], April 10, 2018</ref> The slides and presentation of the Analysis Group were substanitally the same as the ICANN 61 presentation. The webinar comments were again complimentary of the Analysis Group's work and recommendations as a whole. [[Mark Seiden]] lamented the lack of fine-grained attention in the review to policy-making by each NomCom. As an example, he noted that the current NomCom did not routinely publish its decision-making or proposed changes to process for public comment. This, and other transparency issues, indicated to Seiden that the "secrecy" issues surrounding the NomCom remained. [[Ole Jacobsen]] commented that there should be better connection and communication between the different NomCom cycles, so that continuity and transparency could be strengthened. [[Tom Barrett]] solicited comments on how the NomCom might better address and support the Empowered Community model. [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]] agreed that the Empowered Community had placed additional obligations on the NomCom, as with all organizations. However, she noted too that there was not yet a full-term NomCom process within the post-EC world, and that this might be something to readdress in the future.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/NomCom+Review+Working+Party+Meetings?preview=/66078095/84214267/NomCom%20Webinar_10APR18_mp3%20audio.mp3 NomCom2 Archive - Audio Recording of Draft Report Webinar], April 10, 2018</ref>
+The draft final report also received ten written comments from ICANN organizations and constituencies during the public comment period.<ref>[https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/2018q2/date.html NomCom2 Listserv Archive - Public Comments on Draft Final Report], April 12 - May 10, 2018</ref>
 ==References==
 [[Category:Organizational Reviews]]