Changes

no edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:  
* Lack of formality leading to concerns about transparency; and
 
* Lack of formality leading to concerns about transparency; and
 
* Perceived and actual conflicts of interest.<ref name="draftfr" />
 
* Perceived and actual conflicts of interest.<ref name="draftfr" />
   
In particular, the longstanding relationships of SSAC members, most of which predated ICANN involvement, led to a collegial and informal culture that affected both the outside perception of the SSAC and internal and external understanding of the SSAC's role within the ICANN ecosystem. As an example, JAS noted that policies and procedures around conflicts of interest were nearly nonexistent:
 
In particular, the longstanding relationships of SSAC members, most of which predated ICANN involvement, led to a collegial and informal culture that affected both the outside perception of the SSAC and internal and external understanding of the SSAC's role within the ICANN ecosystem. As an example, JAS noted that policies and procedures around conflicts of interest were nearly nonexistent:
 
<blockquote>An unreleased internal draft SSAC policies and procedures document provided to JAS contains the following language regarding perceived and actual conflicts of interest:
 
<blockquote>An unreleased internal draft SSAC policies and procedures document provided to JAS contains the following language regarding perceived and actual conflicts of interest:
 
''The committee does not ordinarily concern itself with conflicts of interest. All members are always permitted to participate in all activities. However, the committee may elect to state potential conflicts of interest as an integral part of any publication if it deems this to enhance the final result. An individual may elect not to participate in any activity of the committee at his or her own discretion.''
 
''The committee does not ordinarily concern itself with conflicts of interest. All members are always permitted to participate in all activities. However, the committee may elect to state potential conflicts of interest as an integral part of any publication if it deems this to enhance the final result. An individual may elect not to participate in any activity of the committee at his or her own discretion.''
 
We observe that this is an accurate characterization of SSAC's current views on perceived or actual conflicts of interest; in practice, we find little to no formal attention to the issue.<ref name="draftfr" /></blockquote>
 
We observe that this is an accurate characterization of SSAC's current views on perceived or actual conflicts of interest; in practice, we find little to no formal attention to the issue.<ref name="draftfr" /></blockquote>
Despite the perceptual issues, the importance and quality of the SSAC's work was universally acknowledged. In addition, the report noted multiple favorable comments regarding the SSAC's handling of the [[Verisign Site Finder]] situation.<ref name="draftfr" />
+
Despite the perceptual issues, the importance and quality of the SSAC's work was universally acknowledged. The executive summary of the draft final report stated that the SSAC was "functioning, functioning well, and filling a relevant purpose."<ref name="draftfr" /> In addition, the report called out the community's appreciation and respect for the SSAC's handling of the [[Verisign Site Finder]] situation.<ref name="draftfr" /> The draft report offered thirty-four recommendations to improve organizational and communication clarity inside the SSAC and in cross-community work, address gaps in formalized policy or procedures within the SSAC, and generally alleviate the "growing pains" experienced by the SSAC in the first years of its existence.<ref name="draftfr" />  
    
==References==
 
==References==
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits