ICANN 72: Difference between revisions
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
# ICANN establish working procedures and tools for cooperation with governments to review, evaluate, and implement the requirements of national regulations; and | # ICANN establish working procedures and tools for cooperation with governments to review, evaluate, and implement the requirements of national regulations; and | ||
# ICANN encourage multilingual interactions. | # ICANN encourage multilingual interactions. | ||
* In the joint ICANN Board-ALAC meeting, [[Yrjo Lansipuro]] said ALAC can help ICANN reach civil servants at the municipal level especially via [[ALS]]es | * In the joint ICANN Board-ALAC meeting, [[Yrjo Lansipuro]] said ALAC can help ICANN reach civil servants at the municipal level especially via [[ALS]]es. | ||
* In the [[CSG]]-ICANN Board joint meeting, [[Lori Shulman]] and [[Brian King]] offered five pieces of advice: | |||
# how to coordinate messaging to governments and IGOS: ICANN's tripartite arrangement (ICANN Board, Org, and Community) is important but for the purpose of advocacy, it might not be the best model. We should be one in messaging, and unified talking points should be circulated. | |||
# tracking legislation: ICANN should better engage internally and make a hub to access information from all of the ICANN volunteers; figure out who our friends are on [[cybersecurity]], [[NIS2]], and [[Whois]] issues (to help us interpret them); make better use of [[GAC]] member for early warning signs of potential legislation-related issues; stop thinking of GAC as a monolith; | |||
# GAC members should bring along their cybersecurity, [[Data Privacy]], and Intellectual property office representatives to gain their perspectives earlier, as they offer a clear picture of the balance between commercial and public interests in their nations | |||
# pay more attention to [[ccTLD]] operators to see how they're managing legislation responses | |||
===DNS Abuse=== | ===DNS Abuse=== |