Cross Community Working Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Sufficient opportunity should be provided for non-participating organizations to give input on draft CCWG deliverables<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 2, GNSO, ICANN]</ref> | * Sufficient opportunity should be provided for non-participating organizations to give input on draft CCWG deliverables<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 2, GNSO, ICANN]</ref> | ||
==CCWG Formation== | ==CCWG Formation== | ||
At least two drafting organizations must answer the following questions to determine whether they should form a CCWG. Some questions are closed (Yes/No) while others are open-ended.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref> | |||
# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC? | # Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC? | ||
If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed | If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed |