Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:  
==CCWG Formation==
 
==CCWG Formation==
 
At least two drafting organizations must answer the following questions to determine whether they should form a CCWG. Some questions are closed (Yes/No) while others are open-ended.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>  
 
At least two drafting organizations must answer the following questions to determine whether they should form a CCWG. Some questions are closed (Yes/No) while others are open-ended.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>  
# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC?  
+
# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
   
# Does the issue cut across different SO/ACs? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
 
# Does the issue cut across different SO/ACs? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
 
# Is there broad community interest across SO/ACs to engage on this topic? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
 
# Is there broad community interest across SO/ACs to engage on this topic? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
Line 20: Line 19:  
# Is it likely that resolving the issue through a CCWG will have a substantial budgetary impact?
 
# Is it likely that resolving the issue through a CCWG will have a substantial budgetary impact?
 
# What is the expected outcome?  
 
# What is the expected outcome?  
# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for
+
# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for action/consideration?
action/consideration?
   
# What other alternatives are available to address the issue?
 
# What other alternatives are available to address the issue?
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,932

edits

Navigation menu