Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''SRS''' is the abbreviation for '''Shared Registry System'''. It came into existence in October, 1998 when the United Sates Department of Commerce ([[DOC]]) and [[Network Solutions]] amended their co-operative agreement, originally stating that Network Solutions was the sole [[Registrar|registrar]] and [[Registry|registry]] administrator for [[TLD|top-level domains]] such as [[.net]], [[.org]], [[.com]], etc. The amendment establishment a Shared Registry System, meaning that an unlimited number of registrars may compete in the domain name registration business by using one shared registry.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref> It was a cooperative effort between Network Solutions and the U.S. Government to introduce stiff competition in the arena of the registration of second-level domain ([[SLD]]s) in the .net, .com, and .org TLDs.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/instructions-10sep10-en.htm icann.org]</ref>
+
'''Shared Registry System''' ('''SRS''') refers to a system in which an unlimited number of registrars may compete in the domain name registration business by using one shared registry. The SRS came into existence in October 1998 when the United Sates [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] (DOC) and [[Network Solutions]] amended their co-operative agreement, originally stating that Network Solutions was the sole [[Registrar|registrar]] and [[Registry|registry]] administrator for [[TLD|top-level domains]] such as [[.net]], [[.org]], and [[.com]].<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref> It was a cooperative effort between Network Solutions and the U.S. Government to introduce competition into the arena of the registration of second-level domain ([[SLD]]s) in the .net, .com, and .org TLDs.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/instructions-10sep10-en.htm icann.org]</ref>
    
== SRS and ICANN ==
 
== SRS and ICANN ==
Line 9: Line 9:  
Starting in April 1999, ICANN was in charge of accepting the applications for registrar accreditation for the post-testbed period of the SRS. It accredited more than 160 businesses along with the five testbed program participants.  
 
Starting in April 1999, ICANN was in charge of accepting the applications for registrar accreditation for the post-testbed period of the SRS. It accredited more than 160 businesses along with the five testbed program participants.  
   −
From 2001 to 2009, ICANN adopted the Registrar Accreditation Agreement ([[RAA]]) for all accredited registrars. In May 2009, [[ICANN Board]] approved a total 17 amendments to the RAA.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref>
+
From 2001 to 2009, ICANN adopted the [[RAA|Registrar Accreditation Agreement]] (RAA) for all accredited registrars. In May 2009, the [[ICANN Board]] approved a total 17 amendments to the RAA. This agreement continues to be a hotly debated and edited agreement at nearly every ICANN meeting.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref>
    
== Problems in the Allocation of SRS ==
 
== Problems in the Allocation of SRS ==
In 2001, there were reports about some registrars experiencing difficulties in evaluating the .com, .net, .org SRS in the hours wherein expiring names are deleted. After an investigation, it was found that substantial amounts of the bandwidth were being used in the wee hours by some registries, making large amounts of queries to expire. ICANN took note of this matter and began keeping the community informed about its search a remedy. The solutions was the equitable allocation of the Shared Registry System, wherein every ICANN-accredited registrar was limited to use 256K of bandwidth and 250 simultaneous RRP connections.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm icann.org]</ref>
+
In 2001, there were reports about some registrars experiencing difficulties in evaluating the .com, .net, .org SRS in the hours wherein expiring names are deleted. After an investigation, it was found that substantial amounts of the bandwidth were being used in the wee hours by some registries, causing a large amount of queries to expire. ICANN took note of this matter and began keeping the community informed about its search a remedy. The solutions was the equitable allocation of the Shared Registry System, wherein every ICANN-accredited registrar was limited to use 256K of bandwidth and 250 simultaneous RRP connections.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm icann.org]</ref>
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 18: Line 18:     
[[category: Glossary]]
 
[[category: Glossary]]
 +
[[Category:Featured]]
    
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Navigation menu