Jump to content

Shared Registry System: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Saassoln (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JP (talk | contribs)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
'''Shared Registry System''' ('''SRS''') refers to a system in which an unlimited number of registrars may compete in the domain name registration business by using one shared registry. The SRS came into existence in October 1998 when the United Sates [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] (DOC) and [[Network Solutions]] amended their co-operative agreement, originally stating that Network Solutions was the sole [[Registrar|registrar]] and [[Registry|registry]] administrator for [[TLD|top-level domains]] such as [[.net]], [[.org]], and [[.com]].<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref> It was a cooperative effort between Network Solutions and the U.S. Government to introduce competition into the arena of the registration of second-level domain ([[SLD]]s) in the .net, .com, and .org TLDs.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/instructions-10sep10-en.htm icann.org]</ref>
 
'''SRS''' is the abbreviation for '''Shared Registry System'''. It came into existence in October, 1998 when the United Sates Department of Commerce ([[DOC]]) and Network Solutions Inc or [[NSI]] amended their Co-operative agreement. Under this agreement, the NSI was the sole registrar and registry administrator for top-level domains such as .net, .org, .com, etc. The amendment made to the agreement required the establishment of the Shared Registry System. <ref name="link1">[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm icann.org]accreditation history</ref> 
 
== What is included in SRS? ==
 
In the Shared Registry System, an unlimited number of registrars compete for the domain name registration business by using one shared registry.<ref name="link1">[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm icann.org]accreditation history</ref> It is a cooperative effort between the NSI and U.S. Government to introduce stiff competition in the arena of the registration of the second-level domain or SLDs in the .net, .com, .org top level domains or TLDs. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/instructions-10sep10-en.htm icann.org]</ref>


== SRS and ICANN ==
== SRS and ICANN ==


The US Department of Commerce appointed the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ([[ICANN]]) to look after the transition to completion under the SRS. The main responsibilities of ICANN included formulating and implementing a procedure for the sake of registrar accreditation which will help in a competitive domain name registration system that would ensure a continued domain-name durability and Internet stability.
The US Department of Commerce appointed [[ICANN]] to look after the transition to SRS. The main responsibilities of ICANN included formulating and implementing a procedure for the sake of registrar accreditation, in a way that would create a competitive domain name registration system, ensuring continued domain name durability and Internet stability.
   
   
In March 1999, ICANN started accepting applications from several companies who were interested to participate in the one of the five domain name registrars of the SRS Testbed Program, which was prescribed in the Amendment 11 of the DOC’s cooperative agreement with the NSI.  
In March 1999, ICANN started accepting applications from companies who were interested in participating as one of five domain name registrars in SRS Testbed Program, which was prescribed in Amendment 11 of the DOC’s cooperative agreement with Network Solutions.  


Since April 1999, ICANN was in charge of accepting the applications for registrar accreditation for the post-testbed period of the SRS and accredited more than 160 businesses coupled with the five testbed program participants.  
Starting in April 1999, ICANN was in charge of accepting the applications for registrar accreditation for the post-testbed period of the SRS. It accredited more than 160 businesses along with the five testbed program participants.  


From the year 2001 to 2009, ICANN adopted Registrar Accreditation Agreement or RAA for all the accredited registrars. In May 2009, ICANN Board approved a total 17 amendments to RAA.<ref name="link1">[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm icann.org]accreditation history</ref>
From 2001 to 2009, ICANN adopted the [[RAA|Registrar Accreditation Agreement]] (RAA) for all accredited registrars. In May 2009, the [[ICANN Board]] approved a total 17 amendments to the RAA. This agreement continues to be a hotly debated and edited agreement at nearly every ICANN meeting.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-history.htm ICANN Accreditation History]</ref>


== Problems in the allocation of SRS ==
== Problems in the Allocation of SRS ==
 
In 2001, there were reports about some registrars experiencing difficulties in evaluating the .com, .net, .org SRS in the hours wherein expiring names are deleted. After an investigation, it was found that substantial amounts of the bandwidth were being used in the wee hours by some registries, causing a large amount of queries to expire. ICANN took note of this matter and began keeping the community informed about its search a remedy. The solutions was the equitable allocation of the Shared Registry System, wherein every ICANN-accredited registrar was limited to use 256K of bandwidth and 250 simultaneous RRP connections.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm icann.org]</ref>
In the year 2001, there were reports about some registrars experiencing difficulties in evaluating the .com, .net, .org SRS in the hours wherein the expiring names are deleted. After investigations, it was found that substantial amounts of the bandwidth were being used in the wee hours by some registries which made large amounts of queries to expire. ICANN took notice of this matter and stated to keep the community informed about finding a remedy. ICANN then came up with a solution of equitable allocation of Shared Registry System wherein every ICANN accredited registrar was limited to use 256K of bandwidth and 250 simultaneous RRP connections. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm icann.org]</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


[[category: glossary]]
[[category: Glossary]]
[[Category:Featured]]


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 18:07, 12 January 2022

Shared Registry System (SRS) refers to a system in which an unlimited number of registrars may compete in the domain name registration business by using one shared registry. The SRS came into existence in October 1998 when the United Sates Department of Commerce (DOC) and Network Solutions amended their co-operative agreement, originally stating that Network Solutions was the sole registrar and registry administrator for top-level domains such as .net, .org, and .com.[1] It was a cooperative effort between Network Solutions and the U.S. Government to introduce competition into the arena of the registration of second-level domain (SLDs) in the .net, .com, and .org TLDs.[2]

SRS and ICANN

The US Department of Commerce appointed ICANN to look after the transition to SRS. The main responsibilities of ICANN included formulating and implementing a procedure for the sake of registrar accreditation, in a way that would create a competitive domain name registration system, ensuring continued domain name durability and Internet stability.

In March 1999, ICANN started accepting applications from companies who were interested in participating as one of five domain name registrars in SRS Testbed Program, which was prescribed in Amendment 11 of the DOC’s cooperative agreement with Network Solutions.

Starting in April 1999, ICANN was in charge of accepting the applications for registrar accreditation for the post-testbed period of the SRS. It accredited more than 160 businesses along with the five testbed program participants.

From 2001 to 2009, ICANN adopted the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) for all accredited registrars. In May 2009, the ICANN Board approved a total 17 amendments to the RAA. This agreement continues to be a hotly debated and edited agreement at nearly every ICANN meeting.[3]

Problems in the Allocation of SRS

In 2001, there were reports about some registrars experiencing difficulties in evaluating the .com, .net, .org SRS in the hours wherein expiring names are deleted. After an investigation, it was found that substantial amounts of the bandwidth were being used in the wee hours by some registries, causing a large amount of queries to expire. ICANN took note of this matter and began keeping the community informed about its search a remedy. The solutions was the equitable allocation of the Shared Registry System, wherein every ICANN-accredited registrar was limited to use 256K of bandwidth and 250 simultaneous RRP connections.[4]

References