14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 322:
Line 322: − + − + Line 333:
Line 333: − + Line 340:
Line 340: − + Line 360:
Line 360: − + Line 367:
Line 367: − + − + − + − + − + − + Line 389:
Line 389: − + − + − + Line 402:
Line 402: − + − + − + − + Line 424:
Line 424: − + Line 431:
Line 431: − + Line 437:
Line 437: − + − + Line 444:
Line 444: − + − + Line 452:
Line 452: − + Line 459:
Line 459: − + Line 466:
Line 466: − + Line 480:
Line 480: − + Line 507:
Line 507: − + − +
no edit summary
| No
| No
| Deny; refer to [[SUBPRO]] for possible lessons learned
| Deny; refer to [[SUBPRO]] for possible lessons learned
| Denied and referred to [[SUBPRO]]
| Denied and referred to SUBPRO
| "ICANN’s accountability mechanisms are not intended for instances where a requestor: (1) is fully aware of the potential risks and defined outcomes within a process; (2) chooses to participate within that process; and (3) when they experience an unfavorable but defined outcome, seeks relief from that outcome."
| "ICANN’s [[Accountability Mechanisms]] are not intended for instances where a requestor: (1) is fully aware of the potential risks and defined outcomes within a process; (2) chooses to participate within that process; and (3) when they experience an unfavorable but defined outcome, seeks relief from that outcome."
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-2-2014-02-07-en 13-2:] [[Nameshop]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-2-2014-02-07-en 13-2:] [[Nameshop]]
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-3-2014-02-12-en 13-3:] [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-3-2014-02-12-en 13-3:] [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group]]
| Introduction of "prior offender" URLs in the [[Trademark Clearinghouse]]
| Introduction of "prior offender" [[URL]]s in the [[Trademark Clearinghouse]]
| No
| No
| Deny; but, the request raises important points wrt "policy" versus "implementation", and expanding the mechanisms of community consultation
| Deny; but, the request raises important points wrt "policy" versus "implementation", and expanding the mechanisms of community consultation
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-4-2014-02-12-en 13-4:] [[DotConnectAfrica Trust]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-4-2014-02-12-en 13-4:] [[DotConnectAfrica Trust]]
| Rejection of DCA Trust's [[.africa]] application in the [[New gTLD Program]]
| Rejection of [[DotConnectAfrica|DCA]] Trust's [[.africa]] application in the [[New gTLD Program]]
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
|
|
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-7-2014-02-13-en 13-7:] Dish DBS Corp.
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-7-2014-02-13-en 13-7:] [[Dish DBS Corporation|Dish DBS Corp]]
| Dish attempted to register [[.direct]] and DirectTV's objection was upheld
| Dish attempted to register [[.direct]] and DirectTV's objection was upheld
| No
| No
|
|
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-8-2014-02-13-en 13-8:] Merck KGaA
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-8-2014-02-13-en 13-8:] [[Merck KGaA]]
| New gTLD Committee's recommendation that third party neutrals consider extenuating circumstances regarding missed objection deadlines
| New gTLD Committee's recommendation that third party neutrals consider extenuating circumstances regarding missed objection deadlines
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| Merck KGaA, a German company had applied for .merck and .emerck. The American Merck & Co.'s objections to the two applications were ten and eleven minutes late, respectively
| Merck KGaA, a German company had applied for [[.merck]] and .emerck. The American [[[[Merck & Co. Inc.|Merck & Co.]]'s objections to the two applications were ten and eleven minutes late, respectively
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-9-2014-02-13-en 13-9:] Amazon EU S.a.r.l.
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-9-2014-02-13-en 13-9:] [[Amazon]] EU S.a.r.l.
| Amazon attempted to register a string that represented the Japanese translation of "online shopping." Commercial Connect objected to the application based on their application for [[.shop]]
| Amazon attempted to register a string that represented the Japanese translation of "online shopping." [[Commercial Connect]] objected to the application based on their application for [[.shop]]
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| Two 13-9 and 13-10 represented two different outcomes on similar facts - foreign language translations of "shopping" and their impact on [[.shop]]. The BGC recommended that a report be prepared regarding the two string confusion cases, and that neither string proceed to contracting until the NGPC had an opportunity to review.
| Two 13-9 and 13-10 represented two different outcomes on similar facts - foreign language translations of "shopping" and their impact on [[.shop]]. The [[BGC]] recommended that a report be prepared regarding the two [[String Confusion Objection|string confusion cases]], and that neither string proceed to contracting until the [[Board Committees|NGPC]] had an opportunity to review.
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-10-2014-02-13-en 13-10:] [[Commercial Connect LLC]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-10-2014-02-13-en 13-10:] [[Commercial Connect LLC]]
| The partner case to 13-9 - here Top Level Domain Holdings applied for a string representing a Chinese translation of "shop" and Commercial Connect's objection was denied
| The partner case to 13-9 - here [[Top Level Domain Holdings]] applied for a string representing a Chinese translation of "shop" and Commercial Connect's objection was denied
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-11-2014-02-13-en 13-11:] [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-11-2014-02-13-en 13-11:] [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group]]
| Asking the board to review the sufficiency of the staff reponse to the NCSG's [[Documentary Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP request]] regarding information related to the TMCH "Strawman" (which included the "50 prior offender" provision which was the subject of RR 13-3) and RR 13-3.
| Asking the board to review the sufficiency of the staff response to the NCSG's [[Documentary Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP request]] regarding information related to the TMCH "Strawman" (which included the "50 prior offender" provision which was the subject of RR 13-3) and RR 13-3.
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
| No action
| No action
| Under the then-current Bylaws, the BGC had the discretion to deny reconsideration requests regarding ICANN staff action or inaction without reference to the board. This request did not state "propergrounds for reconsideration" and was denied without further consideration. This is similar to the current "dismissal" powers of the BAMC.
| Under the then-current Bylaws, the BGC had the discretion to deny reconsideration requests regarding ICANN staff action or inaction without reference to the board. This request did not state "proper grounds for reconsideration" and was denied without further consideration. This is similar to the current "dismissal" powers of the [[Board Committees|BAMC]].
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-12-2014-02-13-en 13-12:] Tencent Holdings Limited
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-12-2014-02-13-en 13-12:] Tencent Holdings Limited
| Tencent applied for 微博 and .Weibo. Sina, the mark holder for 微博, objected to both applications and the objections were sustained.
| Tencent applied for 微博 and [[.Weibo]]. Sina, the mark holder for 微博, objected to both applications and the objections were sustained.
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
|
|
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-13-2014-02-13-en 13-13:] Christopher Barron
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-13-2014-02-13-en 13-13:] [[Christopher Barron]]
| Rejection of GoPROUD's objection to dotgay LLC's application for [[.gay]]
| Rejection of [https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-implosion-of-goproud-the-rights-most-notorious-pro-gay-group# GOProud]]'s objection to [[Dotgay LLC]]'s application for [[.gay]]
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| Deny
| The BGC's recommendation was moot by the time the NGPC considered it, as GoProud had dissolved and reformed, and Christopher Barron was not associated with the new entity, nor could he otherwise be contacted.
| The BGC's recommendation was moot by the time the NGPC considered it, as GOProud had dissolved and reformed, and Christopher Barron was not associated with the new entity, nor could he otherwise be contacted.
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-14-2014-02-13-en 13-14:] DERCars, LLC
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-14-2014-02-13-en 13-14:] DERCars, LLC
| Google submitted objections to the three applications for [[.cars]], but only prevailed as it related to DERCars' application.
| [[Google]] submitted objections to the three applications for [[.cars]], but only prevailed as it related to DERCars' application.
| No
| No
| No action - request was withdrawn
| No action - request was withdrawn
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-16-2014-02-13-en 13-16:] dot Sport Limited
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-16-2014-02-13-en 13-16:] dot Sport Limited
| SportAccord's objection to dot Sports' application for [[.sport]] was sustained
| [[SportAccord]]'s objection to dot Sports' application for [[.sport]] was sustained
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-17-2014-02-13-en 13-17:] GCCIX, W.L.L.
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-17-2014-02-13-en 13-17:] GCCIX, W.L.L.
| GCCIX applied for .GCC, which received objections from both the GAC and the Gulf Cooperation Council. The NGPC acted on the GAC advice and rejected the application
| GCCIX applied for [[.gcc]], which received objections from both the[[GAC]] and the Gulf Cooperation Council. The NGPC acted on the GAC advice and rejected the application
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
|
|
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-18-2014-02-13-en 13-18:] ILGA
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-18-2014-02-13-en 13-18:] [[ILGA]]
| ILGA's community objection to Afilias' application for [[.lgbt]] was rejected
| ILGA's community objection to [[Afilias]]' application for [[.lgbt]] was rejected
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
| Denied without recommendation to the NGPC
| Denied without recommendation to the NGPC
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-19-2014-02-13-en 13-19:] HOTREC
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-19-2014-02-13-en 13-19:] [[HOTREC]]
| HOTREC lost a community objection proceeding related to [[.hotels]]; the RR contends that NGPC should have stayed that proceeding when it paused consideration of several "closed generic" applications to allow time to engage with the GAC.
| HOTREC lost a community objection proceeding related to [[.hotels]]; the RR contends that NGPC should have stayed that proceeding when it paused consideration of several "closed generic" applications to allow time to engage with the [[GAC]].
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-20-2014-02-13-en 13-20:] DotSecure, Inc.
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-20-2014-02-13-en 13-20:] DotSecure, Inc.
| DotSecure applied for [[.bank]]. The Int'l Banking Federation objected and the objection was sustained
| [[Radix|DotSecure]] applied for [[.bank]]. The Int'l Banking Federation objected and the objection was sustained
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-21-2014-02-14-en 13-21:] European Lotteries
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-21-2014-02-14-en 13-21:] European Lotteries
| Requester objected to Afilias' application for [[.lotto]], and lost
| Requester objected to [[Afilias]]'s application for [[.lotto]], and lost
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-22-2014-02-14-en 12-22:] [[DotMusic]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-22-2014-02-14-en 12-22:] [[DotMusic]]
| DotMusic's community objection to Amazon's [[.music]] application did not prevail
| DotMusic's community objection to [[Amazon]]'s [[.music]] application did not prevail
| No*
| No*
| Deny
| Deny
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-1-2014-02-14-en 14-1:] [[Medistry LLC]]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-1-2014-02-14-en 14-1:] [[Medistry LLC]]
| The [[Independent Objector]] submitted a objection to Medistry's application for [[.med]]. Medistry appealled on the grounds that the IO cannot object unless there is at least one public comment that opposes the application.
| The [[Independent Objector]] submitted a objection to Medistry's application for [[.med]]. Medistry appealed on the grounds that the IO cannot object unless there is at least one public comment that opposes the application.
| No
| No
| Reversed; Medistry's application allowed to proceed
| Reversed; Medistry's application allowed to proceed
| The panel's decision took the applicant's [[Public Interest Commitments]] into account
| The panel's decision took the applicant's [[Public Interest Commitments]] into account
|-
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-5-2014-02-14-en 14-5:] Vistaprint Limited
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-5-2014-02-14-en 14-5:] [[.vistaprint|Vistaprint]] Limited
| Web.com Group successfully objected to Vistaprint's [[.webs]] application on string confusion grounds
| [[Web.com]] Group successfully objected to Vistaprint's [[.webs]] application on string confusion grounds
| No
| No
| Deny
| Deny