14,952
edits
Changes
Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (view source)
Revision as of 19:40, 13 January 2022
, 2 years ago→Criticism
==Criticism==
==Criticism==
* [[Sarah Clayton]] argues that the 12 defined conditions of non-disclosure (DCND) "essentially provide an administrative loophole for ICANN to restrict the free flow of information."<ref>[http://sunbelt2016.insna.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016-Sunbelt-Program_040516_FINAL_wchange-for-online.pdf International Sunbelt Social Network Conference 2016]</ref> Furthermore, her statistical p* models demonstrate that
*# [[ICANN Organization]] considers lengthier submissions to be more likely to request contentious information and are more likely to apply DCND to them
*# ICANN [[Stakeholder Group]]s/[[Working Group]]s are more likely to receive DCND in every condition category, except the "Affects Individual" condition
*# "Burdensome conditions" are rarely imposed on [[:Category:Legal Practices|law firms]], which tend to request precise information about a specific case
*# [[Registrant]]s are less likely to receive ICANN "Integrity" conditions as they are more concerned about their own domain name registrations than about ICANN
*# "Confidential External Business Information" conditions are less likely to be imposed on internet [[:Category:Non-Profit|non-profits]], as they are more interested in ICANN’s interface with [[Internet Governance]] than third-party business interests.<ref>[file:///C:/Users/jesri/Downloads/sclaydidp%20(1).pdf Sarah Clayton, Which Authors of ICANN Documentary Information Disclosure Policy Requests Are Likely to Receive Defined Conditions of Non-Disclosure in ICANN’s Response?]</ref>
==References==
==References==