Reconsideration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
| "ICANN could not responsibly reject proposals for new TLDs merely because the applicants have requested TLDs that include letters also found in country-code TLDs such as <.bz.>" | | "ICANN could not responsibly reject proposals for new TLDs merely because the applicants have requested TLDs that include letters also found in country-code TLDs such as <.bz.>" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/01-3-2014-02-07-en 01-3:] [[Monsoon Assets Limited]] (BVI) | | [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/01-3-2014-02-07-en 01-3:] [[Monsoon Assets Limited]] (BVI) | ||
| Request to reconsider non-selection of Monsoon's application for the New TLD pilot | | Request to reconsider non-selection of Monsoon's application for the New TLD pilot | ||
| No* | | No* | ||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
| Reconsideration request was not timely submitted and did not substantiate its claims | | Reconsideration request was not timely submitted and did not substantiate its claims | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Diverse and Sparse Requests: 2001-2010=== | ===Diverse and Sparse Requests: 2001-2010=== | ||
During most of the 2000s, the reconsideration mechanism was used for a variety of complaints about ICANN processes or policy-making. There were no reconsideration requests in 2003, 2007, 2008, and 2009. | During most of the 2000s, the reconsideration mechanism was used for a variety of complaints about ICANN processes or policy-making. There were no reconsideration requests in 2003, 2007, 2008, and 2009. | ||