3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,042:
Line 1,042: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (view source)
Revision as of 23:20, 2 February 2022
, 2 years ago→Summary Tables of DIDP Requests & Responses
| 2, 3, & 9
| 2, 3, & 9
|
|
|-
| 23 February 2018
| Arif Ali on behalf of [[Afilias]]
| Update on the [[.web]] contention set, including: documents of any steps taken regarding Nu Dot Co.'s change of ownership or control in violation of the [[Applicant Guidebook]]; documents of any steps taken to analyze competition issues arising from the delegation of .web to [[Verisign]]. And, information & documents related to all applications for .web, communications between applicants and ICANN, and other documents. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180223-1-ali-request-23feb18-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180223-1-ali-response-24mar18-en.pdf Initially declined] to produce documents on threshold grounds (no such documents in ICANN's possession) and DCND grounds. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180223-1-ali-supp-response-redacted-27apr18-en.pdf Subsequently responded] to say that all other parties except responded to ICANN's queries affirming that they wanted their application materials to remain confidential.
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, & 12
|
|-
| 25 March 2018
| Jonathan Matkowsky on behalf of RiskIQ, Inc.
| All documents "referring or relating to enforcement forbearance from GDPR." [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180325-1-matkowsky-request-25mar18-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180325-1-matkowsky-response-24apr18-en.pdf Pointed to public information], declined to produce more
| 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, & 9
|
|-
| 26 March 2018
| Akriti Bopanna on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society
| Fiscal Year 2017 reporting (similar to prior requests for detailed financial information)
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180326-1-bopanna-response-25apr18-en.pdf Initially responded] that the information would be posed once complete. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180326-1-bopanna-response-01jun18-en.pdf Followed up] with a copy of the report and a link to the report on ICANN's website
| No
|
|-
| 23 April 2018
| Arif Ali on behalf of [[Afilias]]
| "Amended" several items from the February 2018 DIDP request, and proposed that other items from that request be produced under the terms of a confidentiality agreement. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180423-1-ali-request-23apr18-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180423-1-ali-response-23may18-en.pdf Declined again] - the "confidentiality agreement" because it defeated the point of DIDP requests, and the "amended" requests for DCND reasons similar to ICANN's response to the February request.
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, & 11
| "As explained in ICANN organization’s 27 April 2018 response email to you, the concept of a confidentiality agreement for the disclosure of documents through the DIDP runs afoul of the DIDP itself, which is to make public documents concerning ICANN organization’s operations unless there is a compelling reason for confidentiality...The DIDP is not a mechanism for one to make information requests or requests to obtain litigation-style discovery. <br />As further indicated in ICANN’s 27 April 2018 response email, ICANN’s DIDP Response 20180223-1 indicated that Item Nos. 5 and 6(a)-(b) were overbroad and vague, and that Requestor could further clarify or narrow the scope of those Items if it wished to do so. Afilias’ 23 April 2018 letter, however, goes far beyond those parameters and, in many instances, broadens and/or fundamentally changes the requests contained in DIDP Request 20180223-1. As such, and as indicated in ICANN’s 27 April 2018 email, ICANN organization will treat these “amended” requests as a new DIDP Request, with an effective submission date of 23 April 2018, and ICANN organization will respond through and in accordance with the DIDP Process."
|-
| 25 May 2018
| Paul Kurian on behalf of the Centre for Internet and Society
| Salary information for ICANN staff, including regional and gender-specific averages, and ICANN's compensation strategies.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180525-1-kurian-response-23jun18-en.pdf Pointed to public information], declined to produce more documents on DCND grounds
| 2, 4, 6, 8, & 9
|
|-
| 10 June 2018
| [[George Kirikos]]
| Kirikos filed an appeal under GNSO Working Group Guidelines relating to the [[International Governmental Organization-International Non-Governmental Organization Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP Working Group|IGO/INGO Access to Curative Rights PDP]] [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180610-1-kirikos-request-redacted-10jun18-en.pdf His DIDP request] sought recordings or transcripts of conversations specific to that appeal.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180610-1-kirikos-response-10jul18-en.pdf Pointed to public information], declined to produce more on threshold grounds and DCND grounds.
| 2, 3, & 9
|
|-
| 16 July 2018
| Akash Sriram on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society
| Breakdowns of ICANN employees by race and nationality
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180716-1-sriram-response-15aug18-en.pdf Declined] because documents on citizenship did not exist, and because a racial breakdown would involve disclosing documents that were restricted under the DCNDs.
| 1, 4, & 9
|
|-
| 12 November 2018
| Akriti Bopanna on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society
| Documents related to ICANN's Fellowship Program, and specifically: instances where ICANN awarded a fellowship to an individual more than the maximum limit of 3 times; the decision process for awarding a fellowship beyond the maximum; and safeguards to ensure that the maximum is not exceeded
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20181112-1-bopanna-response-12dec18-en.pdf Responded] that the 3x limit on participation was not established until 2018, and would first be in effect for fellowship applications for [[ICANN 65]]. As such, no documents existed responsive to prior procedures.
| 2, 3, & 4
| "As a preliminary matter, the DIDP is a mechanism for the disclosure of documentary information about ICANN org’s operations that are appropriate for disclosure but has not be already been published. This Request seeks the disclosure of information, not documents, and is not an appropriate DIDP request. Nevertheless, ICANN org has responded to your requested items below."
|-
| 21 December 2018
| Arif Ali on behalf of [[Afilias]]
| Correspondence and communication between [[Verisign]] and ICANN regarding: the [[.web]] contention set, Afilias' CEP and IRP regarding the same; and internal and external communications regarding the IRP Implementation Oversight Team's drafting and adoption of Section 7 of the Interim Procedures for IRPs. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20181221-1-ali-request-redacted-21dec18-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20181221-1-ali-response-20jan19-en.pdf Declined] to produce Verisign communications for the same reasons as prior requests; pointed to public listserv archives regarding ITP-IOT communications; and pointed to board briefing materials re: the adoption of the interim supplemental procedures. [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/didp-20181221-1-ali-request-2019-01-24-en Subsequent updates] alerted Afilias to additions to "off list" communication between IOT members
| 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, & 12
| Afilias contended in their DIDP request that Verisign had undue influence on the creation and adoption of the Section 7 rules, to the detriment of Afilias and the Internet community as a whole.
|-
| 6 January 2019
| William Donovan
| Information related to the [[Universal Acceptance Steering Group]] [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190106-1-donovan-request-06jan19-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190106-1-donovan-response-05feb19-en.pdf Pointed to public documents]; most items of the request were for information rather than documents, and some were accusatory.
|
| "Items 9 through 12 are not asking for documentary information, and instead, are seeking the disclosure of information based upon purported presumptions of misconduct on the part of UASG. Thus, these are not proper DIDP requests."
|-
| 25 March 2019
| Akriti Bopanna on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society
| Inquiring about the disposition of proceeds from ICANN's [[Auction of Last Resort|auctions of last resort]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190325-1-bopanna-response-24apr19-en.pdf Pointed to public information] - no new documents presented
| No
|
|-
| 1 April 2019
| Arif Ali on behalf of [[Afilias]]
| Further requests for correspondence & records of IRP-IOT proceedings
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190401-1-ali-response-01may19-en.pdf Responded] that some items were asked and answered in the respons to the December 2018 DIDP request; in other cases, documents did not exist or were subject to DCND
| 3 & 8
|
|-
| 2 April 2019
| Ivan Castaño on behalf of the Government of Colombia
| Requesting documents related to Specifications 11 and 13 of the [[Registry Agreement]] adopted as part of the [[New gTLD Program]].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190402-1-castano-response-23apr19-en.pdf Responded] that no documents existed re: amendments to Specification 13, and that registry operator requests to amend Specification 11 commitments were subject to DCND
| 3, 5, 6, & 8
| The request was in relation to Amazon's application for .amazon, and gaining an understanding about Public Interest Commitments and other aspects of the Registry Agreement
|-
| 5 July 2019
| Akriti Bopanna on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society
| Requesting budget information for policy development, and specifically "detailed breakdown[s] for the budgets for every Advisory Council as well as Supporting Organizations for the previous fiscal year"
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20190705-1-bopanna-response-04aug19-en.pdf Pointed to public information]; no other documents existed that were responsive to the request
| No
| Staff noted that such information might be valuable to produce and would consider it in the future.
|}
|}
==References==
==References==