Internet Commerce Association: Difference between revisions

(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 17:

| linkedin =

| twitter =

| keypeople = [[~~Mason Cole~~]], Board Member

| keypeople = [[Nat Cohen]], Board Member

[[~~Ron Jackson~~]], Board Member

[[Jeremiah Johnston]], Board Member

[[~~Jeremiah Johnston~~]], Board Member

[[Daniel Law]], Board Member

[[~~Phillip Reynolds~~]], Board Member

[[Jay Chapman]], Board Member

[[~~Philip Corwin~~]], Counsel

[[Bob Mountain]], Board Member

[[Zak Muscovitch]], Interim Counsel

[[Kamila Sekiewicz]], Executive Director

}}

'''The Internet Commerce Association''', or '''ICA''', is a Washington based trade organization that represents the interests of domain name investors and developers and the direct search industry through their education of advertisers, working with policy developers, and their lobbying of diverse groups.<ref>[~~http~~://www.internetcommerce.org/~~about_us~~ ICA About]</ref>

'''The Internet Commerce Association''', or '''ICA''', is a Washington based trade organization that represents the interests of domain name investors and developers and the direct search industry through their education of advertisers, working with policy developers, and their lobbying of diverse groups.<ref>[https://www.internetcommerce.org/about-us/ ICA About]</ref>

===Background===

The ICA identifies [[ICANN]] and the U.S. government as the bodies it tries hardest to monitor and work with; and it claims to be the only trade group working with and within these bodies.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/08/23/catching-up-with-the-internet-commerce-association/ Domain Name Wire]</ref> The ICA was created in 2006, following the lawsuit between [[ICANN]] and [[~~VeriSign~~]]. They claim that; "After reviewing that back room-negotiated no-bid perpetual contract, domain name monetization industry leaders concluded that permanent representation within [[ICANN]], in Washington, and in other critical decision-making arenas was needed to protect its collective interests".<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/initiatives_achievements ICA Achievements]</ref>

The ICA identifies [[ICANN]] and the U.S. government as the bodies it tries hardest to monitor and work with; and it claims to be the only trade group working with and within these bodies.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/08/23/catching-up-with-the-internet-commerce-association/ Domain Name Wire]</ref> The ICA was created in 2006, following the lawsuit between [[ICANN]] and [[Verisign]]. They claim that; "After reviewing that back room-negotiated no-bid perpetual contract, domain name monetization industry leaders concluded that permanent representation within [[ICANN]], in Washington, and in other critical decision-making arenas was needed to protect its collective interests".<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/initiatives_achievements ICA Achievements]</ref>

The ICA follows the work of the US [[DOC|Department of Commerce]], [[ICANN]], the [[IGF]], the [[NTIA|National Telecommunications and Information Administration]], and other similar policy making bodies within the IT industry.<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/node/279 ICA News Brief]</ref> It is effectively an ICANN watch-dog, and besides lobbying for its constituents, it is vocal about any instance in which ICANN departs from its own policy or [[ICANN Bylaws|bylaws]].<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/16/oversee-net-and-ica-blast-icann-on-domain-parking-mention-in-new-tld-guidebook/ ICA Blasts ICANN on Domain Parking- DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

==Agenda==

The ICA self-describes its legislative agenda as:

Line 40:

Line 43:

ICA runs mainly on donations made by sponsors, members, and interested individuals; therefore fundraising is an ever-present issue at the ICA. In his resignation letter, the former Executive Director, [[Michael Collins]], made it clear that the organization was facing funding issues and implored concerned members and sponsors to evaluate the benefits of having a voice in Washington and [[ICANN]].<ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/people/internet-commerce-association-executive-director-resigns/3776 DomainNameNews]</ref>

[[Moniker.com]] has held a auctions at no-cost to benefit the ICA.<ref>[http://www.elliotsblog.com/moniker-auction-to-benefit-internet-commerce-association ElliotsBlog]</ref>

[[Moniker|Moniker.com]] has held a auctions at no-cost to benefit the ICA.<ref>[http://www.elliotsblog.com/moniker-auction-to-benefit-internet-commerce-association ElliotsBlog]</ref>

The ICA has also previously announced plans to effectively shut-down its operations due to funding shortfalls.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/25/big-changes-for-internet-commerce-association/ DomainNameWire]</ref>

==ICANN==

* In February, 2011, [[~~Phil~~ Corwin]] of the ICA addressed a letter to the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] and sent copies to [[Rod Beckstrom]] and other [[ICANN]] executives; the letter urged those involved to not allow [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] to become more than an advisory body, and consequently not to allow it to sidetrack progress on new [[gTLD]] issues and other initiatives that the GAC opposed and/or wants greater control over. The letter was sent prior to a special consultation of the [[ICANN Board]] with the GAC in Brussels, and also ahead of the [[ICANN 40|40th ICANN meeting]] held in March, 2011 in San Francisco. The ICA thought that if the ICANN Board acquiesced to the GAC, they would not only be compromising the new [[gTLD]] process but the entire multi-stakeholder model. It also was weary of the GAC's moves to override recommendations made by ICANN working groups on [[Intellectual Property|intellectual property]] issues.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/02/25/ica-tells-icann-dont-fold-under-government-pressure/ ICAN Tells ICANN Not To Fold Under Government Pressure - TheDomains.com]</ref>

*On January 15th, 2018, ICANN introduced the idea of examining and reforming the UDRP with its Version 1.0 of the ICA UDRP Reform Policy Platform, A Re-Examination of the Defense of Laches After 18 Years of the UDRP <ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180115_re_examination_of_the_defense_of_laches_after_18_years_of_the_udrp/ A Re-Examination of the Defense of Laches After 18 Years of the UDRP]</ref>

*In June, 2011, The ICA urged [[ICANN Board|the board]] to adopt a policy that no incumbent registry seeking to affiliate with a registrar be allowed to simply elect to transition to the new gTLD Registry Agreement.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/06/04/exclusive-ica-letter-to-icann-brass-on-variable-pricing-urs-application-to-existing-tlds-including-com/ ICA Letter to ICANN Brass- TheDomains.com]</ref>

* The ICA has long supported initiatives within ICANN to create new [[gTLD]]s, and has chastised those moves that slow down the process, often taking on the [[GAC]], and the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] for their oppositional stances.<ref>[http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2009/dailyposts/20091001.htm DNJournal.com Daily Posts]</ref><ref>[http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2009/dailyposts/20091001.htm DNJournal.com]</ref> However, it has also called for moderation and a balanced approach, notably abstaining from an invitation to sign a 2009 letter urging ICANN to allow new gTLDs.<ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/ica-refused-sign-letter-urging-initiation-gtlds/6142 ICA Refused to Sign Letter Urging GTLD Initiation- DomainNameNews.com]</ref>

* In May, 2011, the ICA and [[Oversee.net]] chastised ICANN for poor wording with regards to [[Domain Parking|domain parking]] in its new [[TLD]] guidebook. ICANN's guidebook asked applicants about their stances on allowing domain parking, and seemed to cast the act as a negative social action. Thus, the ICA and others saw ICANN as overstepping its boundaries and effectively monitoring content on the Internet.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/16/oversee-net-and-ica-blast-icann-on-domain-parking-mention-in-new-tld-guidebook/ ICA Blasts ICANN on Domain Parking - DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

* In February, 2011, [[Philip Corwin]] of the ICA addressed a letter to the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] and sent copies to [[Rod Beckstrom]] and other [[ICANN]] executives; the letter urged those involved to not allow [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] to become more than an advisory body, and consequently not to allow it to sidetrack progress on new [[gTLD]] issues and other initiatives that the GAC opposed and/or wants greater control over. The letter was sent prior to a special consultation of the [[ICANN Board]] with the GAC in Brussels, and also ahead of the [[ICANN 40|40th ICANN meeting]] held in March, 2011 in San Francisco. The ICA thought that if the ICANN Board acquiesced to the GAC, they would not only be compromising the new [[gTLD]] process but the entire multi-stakeholder model. It also was weary of the GAC's moves to override recommendations made by ICANN working groups on [[Intellectual Property|intellectual property]] issues.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/02/25/ica-tells-icann-dont-fold-under-government-pressure/ ICAN Tells ICANN Not To Fold Under Government Pressure - TheDomains.com]</ref>

* At the end of the year in 2009, the contract for ICA's counsel and representative to ICANN and other bodies, [[Philip Corwin]], expired. The thought of not having him, or any representation, at such a crucial time for new [[gTLD]]s and new versions of the [[URS]] was described a concerned ICA member as "disastrous".<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2010/01/24/internet-commerce-association-september-2006-january-2010-r-i-p/ RIP ICA- The Domains.com]</ref> He has since returned to working with the ICA.<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/node/279 Philip Corwin Blog Post]</ref>

Line 57:

Line 69:

[[Category: Organizations]]

~~[[Category:Glossary]]~~

[[Category:Past Sponsors]]

[[Category: ~~Associations~~]]

[[Category: Past ~~Sponsor~~]]

__NOTOC__

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 | linkedin        =
 | twitter         =
-| keypeople       = [[Mason Cole]], Board Member<br>
+| keypeople       = [[Nat Cohen]], Board Member<br>
-[[Ron Jackson]], Board Member<br>
+[[Jeremiah Johnston]], Board Member<br>
-[[Jeremiah Johnston]], Board Member <br>
+[[Daniel Law]], Board Member <br>
-[[Phillip Reynolds]], Board Member<br>
+[[Jay Chapman]], Board Member<br>
-[[Philip Corwin]], Counsel
+[[Bob Mountain]], Board Member<br>
+[[Zak Muscovitch]], Interim Counsel<br>
+[[Kamila Sekiewicz]], Executive Director
 }}
-'''The Internet Commerce Association''', or '''ICA''', is a Washington based trade organization that represents the interests of domain name investors and developers and the direct search industry through their education of advertisers, working with policy developers, and their lobbying of diverse groups.<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/about_us ICA About]</ref>
+'''The Internet Commerce Association''', or '''ICA''', is a Washington based trade organization that represents the interests of domain name investors and developers and the direct search industry through their education of advertisers, working with policy developers, and their lobbying of diverse groups.<ref>[https://www.internetcommerce.org/about-us/ ICA About]</ref>
 ===Background===
-The ICA identifies [[ICANN]] and the U.S. government as the bodies it tries hardest to monitor and work with; and it claims to be the only trade group working with and within these bodies.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/08/23/catching-up-with-the-internet-commerce-association/ Domain Name Wire]</ref> The ICA was created in 2006, following the lawsuit between [[ICANN]] and [[VeriSign]]. They claim that; "After reviewing that back room-negotiated no-bid perpetual contract, domain name monetization industry leaders concluded that permanent representation within [[ICANN]], in Washington, and in other critical decision-making arenas was needed to protect its collective interests".<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/initiatives_achievements ICA Achievements]</ref>
+The ICA identifies [[ICANN]] and the U.S. government as the bodies it tries hardest to monitor and work with; and it claims to be the only trade group working with and within these bodies.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/08/23/catching-up-with-the-internet-commerce-association/ Domain Name Wire]</ref> The ICA was created in 2006, following the lawsuit between [[ICANN]] and [[Verisign]]. They claim that; "After reviewing that back room-negotiated no-bid perpetual contract, domain name monetization industry leaders concluded that permanent representation within [[ICANN]], in Washington, and in other critical decision-making arenas was needed to protect its collective interests".<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/initiatives_achievements ICA Achievements]</ref>
 The ICA follows the work of the US [[DOC|Department of Commerce]], [[ICANN]], the [[IGF]], the [[NTIA|National Telecommunications and Information Administration]], and other similar policy making bodies within the IT industry.<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/node/279 ICA News Brief]</ref> It is effectively an ICANN watch-dog, and besides lobbying for its constituents, it is vocal about any instance in which ICANN departs from its own policy or [[ICANN Bylaws|bylaws]].<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/16/oversee-net-and-ica-blast-icann-on-domain-parking-mention-in-new-tld-guidebook/ ICA Blasts ICANN on Domain Parking- DomainNameWire.com]</ref>
 ==Agenda==
 The ICA self-describes its legislative agenda as:
@@ Line 40: / Line 43: @@
 ICA runs mainly on donations made by sponsors, members, and interested individuals; therefore fundraising is an ever-present issue at the ICA. In his resignation letter, the former Executive Director, [[Michael Collins]], made it clear that the organization was facing funding issues and implored concerned members and sponsors to evaluate the benefits of having a voice in Washington and [[ICANN]].<ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/people/internet-commerce-association-executive-director-resigns/3776 DomainNameNews]</ref>
-[[Moniker.com]] has held a auctions at no-cost to benefit the ICA.<ref>[http://www.elliotsblog.com/moniker-auction-to-benefit-internet-commerce-association ElliotsBlog]</ref>
+[[Moniker|Moniker.com]] has held a auctions at no-cost to benefit the ICA.<ref>[http://www.elliotsblog.com/moniker-auction-to-benefit-internet-commerce-association ElliotsBlog]</ref>
 The ICA has also previously announced plans to effectively shut-down its operations due to funding shortfalls.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/25/big-changes-for-internet-commerce-association/ DomainNameWire]</ref>
 ==ICANN==
-* In February, 2011, [[Phil Corwin]] of the ICA addressed a letter to the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] and sent copies to [[Rod Beckstrom]] and other [[ICANN]] executives; the letter urged those involved to not allow [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] to become more than an advisory body, and consequently not to allow it to sidetrack progress on new [[gTLD]] issues and other initiatives that the GAC opposed and/or wants greater control over. The letter was sent prior to a special consultation of the [[ICANN Board]] with the GAC in Brussels, and also ahead of the [[ICANN 40|40th ICANN meeting]] held in March, 2011 in San Francisco. The ICA thought that if the ICANN Board acquiesced to the GAC, they would not only be compromising the new [[gTLD]] process but the entire multi-stakeholder model. It also was weary of the GAC's moves to override recommendations made by ICANN working groups on [[Intellectual Property|intellectual property]] issues.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/02/25/ica-tells-icann-dont-fold-under-government-pressure/ ICAN Tells ICANN Not To Fold Under Government Pressure - TheDomains.com]</ref>
+*On January 15th, 2018, ICANN introduced the idea of examining and reforming the UDRP with its Version 1.0 of the ICA UDRP Reform Policy Platform, A Re-Examination of the Defense of Laches After 18 Years of the UDRP <ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180115_re_examination_of_the_defense_of_laches_after_18_years_of_the_udrp/ A Re-Examination of the Defense of Laches After 18 Years of the UDRP]</ref>
+*In June, 2011, The ICA urged [[ICANN Board|the board]] to adopt a policy that no incumbent registry seeking to affiliate with a registrar be allowed to simply elect to transition to the new gTLD Registry Agreement.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/06/04/exclusive-ica-letter-to-icann-brass-on-variable-pricing-urs-application-to-existing-tlds-including-com/ ICA Letter to ICANN Brass- TheDomains.com]</ref>
+* The ICA has long supported initiatives within ICANN to create new [[gTLD]]s, and has chastised those moves that slow down the process, often taking on the [[GAC]], and the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] for their oppositional stances.<ref>[http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2009/dailyposts/20091001.htm DNJournal.com Daily Posts]</ref><ref>[http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2009/dailyposts/20091001.htm DNJournal.com]</ref> However, it has also called for moderation and a balanced approach, notably abstaining from an invitation to sign a 2009 letter urging ICANN to allow new gTLDs.<ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/up-to-the-minute/ica-refused-sign-letter-urging-initiation-gtlds/6142 ICA Refused to Sign Letter Urging GTLD Initiation- DomainNameNews.com]</ref>
+* In May, 2011, the ICA and [[Oversee.net]] chastised ICANN for poor wording with regards to [[Domain Parking|domain parking]] in its new [[TLD]] guidebook. ICANN's guidebook asked applicants about their stances on allowing domain parking, and seemed to cast the act as a negative social action. Thus, the ICA and others saw ICANN as overstepping its boundaries and effectively monitoring content on the Internet.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/16/oversee-net-and-ica-blast-icann-on-domain-parking-mention-in-new-tld-guidebook/ ICA Blasts ICANN on Domain Parking - DomainNameWire.com]</ref>
+* In February, 2011, [[Philip Corwin]] of the ICA addressed a letter to the U.S. [[DOC|Department of Commerce]] and sent copies to [[Rod Beckstrom]] and other [[ICANN]] executives; the letter urged those involved to not allow [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] to become more than an advisory body, and consequently not to allow it to sidetrack progress on new [[gTLD]] issues and other initiatives that the GAC opposed and/or wants greater control over. The letter was sent prior to a special consultation of the [[ICANN Board]] with the GAC in Brussels, and also ahead of the [[ICANN 40|40th ICANN meeting]] held in March, 2011 in San Francisco. The ICA thought that if the ICANN Board acquiesced to the GAC, they would not only be compromising the new [[gTLD]] process but the entire multi-stakeholder model. It also was weary of the GAC's moves to override recommendations made by ICANN working groups on [[Intellectual Property|intellectual property]] issues.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/02/25/ica-tells-icann-dont-fold-under-government-pressure/ ICAN Tells ICANN Not To Fold Under Government Pressure - TheDomains.com]</ref>
 * At the end of the year in 2009, the contract for ICA's counsel and representative to ICANN and other bodies, [[Philip Corwin]], expired. The thought of not having him, or any representation, at such a crucial time for new [[gTLD]]s and new versions of the [[URS]] was described a concerned ICA member as "disastrous".<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2010/01/24/internet-commerce-association-september-2006-january-2010-r-i-p/ RIP ICA- The Domains.com]</ref> He has since returned to working with the ICA.<ref>[http://www.internetcommerce.org/node/279 Philip Corwin Blog Post]</ref>
@@ Line 57: / Line 69: @@
 {{reflist}}
+[[Category: Organizations]]
-[[Category:Glossary]]
+[[Category:Past Sponsors]]
-[[Category: Associations]]
-[[Category: Past Sponsor]]
 __NOTOC__