Advisory Committee: Difference between revisions

Line 13:

===Provision of Advice===

The Bylaws establish that the ACs exist to advise the ICANN Community and Board on topics within each AC's purview.<ref name="~~currentbylaws~~"~~>[https:~~/~~/www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article12 ICANN Bylaws, Article 12], as amended November 28, 2019</ref~~> This is done through the submission of "clear and unambiguous written statement[s]," including a rationale for the provision of the advice. "The Board will respond in a timely manner to ''formal'' advice from all Advisory Committees explaining what action it took and the rationale for doing so"<ref name="~~currentbylaws~~" /> (Section 12.3 of Article 12; emphasis added). Although there is no definition of "formal advice," the inferred definition is advice submitted in written form as described in Section 12.3.

The Bylaws establish that the ACs exist to advise the ICANN Community and Board on topics within each AC's purview.<ref name="art12" /> This is done through the submission of "clear and unambiguous written statement[s]," including a rationale for the provision of the advice. "The Board will respond in a timely manner to ''formal'' advice from all Advisory Committees explaining what action it took and the rationale for doing so"<ref name="art12" /> (Section 12.3 of Article 12; emphasis added). Although there is no definition of "formal advice," the inferred definition is advice submitted in written form as described in Section 12.3.

This leaves open the question of how, if at all, ACs may interject in other conversations that impact their constituencies. The [[First Accountability and Transparency Review]] recommended that the board seek methods of soliciting and incorporating advice into its decision making process in a more defined and transparent manner:

<blockquote>6. The Board should clarify, as soon as possible but no later than June 2011 the distinction between issues that are properly subject to ICANN’s policy development processes and those matters that are properly within the executive functions performed by the ICANN staff and Board and, as soon as practicable, develop complementary mechanisms for consultation in appropriate circumstances with the relevant SOs and ACs on administrative and executive issues that will be addressed at Board level.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf ATRT1 Final Recommendations], December 31, 2010 (PDF)</ref></blockquote>

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ===Provision of Advice===
-The Bylaws establish that the ACs exist to advise the ICANN Community and Board on topics within each AC's purview.<ref name="currentbylaws">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article12 ICANN Bylaws, Article 12], as amended November 28, 2019</ref> This is done through the submission of "clear and unambiguous written statement[s]," including a rationale for the provision of the advice. "The Board will respond in a timely manner to ''formal'' advice from all Advisory Committees explaining what action it took and the rationale for doing so"<ref name="currentbylaws" /> (Section 12.3 of Article 12; emphasis added). Although there is no definition of "formal advice," the inferred definition is advice submitted in written form as described in Section 12.3.
+The Bylaws establish that the ACs exist to advise the ICANN Community and Board on topics within each AC's purview.<ref name="art12" /> This is done through the submission of "clear and unambiguous written statement[s]," including a rationale for the provision of the advice. "The Board will respond in a timely manner to ''formal'' advice from all Advisory Committees explaining what action it took and the rationale for doing so"<ref name="art12" /> (Section 12.3 of Article 12; emphasis added). Although there is no definition of "formal advice," the inferred definition is advice submitted in written form as described in Section 12.3.
 This leaves open the question of how, if at all, ACs may interject in other conversations that impact their constituencies. The [[First Accountability and Transparency Review]] recommended that the board seek methods of soliciting and incorporating advice into its decision making process in a more defined and transparent manner:
 <blockquote>6. The Board should clarify, as soon as possible but no later than June 2011 the distinction between issues that are properly subject to ICANN’s policy development processes and those matters that are properly within the executive functions performed by the ICANN staff and Board and, as soon as practicable, develop complementary mechanisms for consultation in appropriate circumstances with the relevant SOs and ACs on administrative and executive issues that will be addressed at Board level.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf ATRT1 Final Recommendations], December 31, 2010 (PDF)</ref></blockquote>