Cross Community Working Group: Difference between revisions

(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

A Cross-Community Working Group is an [[ICANN]] community of practice that allows Supporting Organizations ([[SO]]s) and Advisory Committees ([[AC]]s) to work together to address an issue of common interest that does not fall within the scope of any single SO or AC. A CCWG is intended to inform and enhance or supplement policy development work, and may precede it, but does not replace it.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>

A '''Cross Community Working Group''' (CCWG) is an [[ICANN]] community of practice that allows Supporting Organizations ([[SO]]s) and Advisory Committees ([[AC]]s) to work together to address an issue of common interest that does not fall within the scope of any single SO or AC. A CCWG is intended to inform and enhance or supplement policy development work, and may precede it, but does not replace it.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>

==Key Characteristics==

* Adoption of a single charter drafted by a cross-community drafting team comprising

Line 10:

* The chartering organizations shall not change the content of the deliverables

* Sufficient opportunity should be provided for non-participating organizations to give input on draft CCWG deliverables<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 2, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>

* In developing its output, work plan, and reports, the CCWG shall act by consensus and designate each position as either full consensus (where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection) or consensus (where a small minority disagrees, but most agree)ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 13, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>

==CCWG Formation==

At least two drafting organizations must answer the following questions to determine whether they should form a CCWG. Some questions are closed (Yes/No) while others are open-ended.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>

# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC?

# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed

If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed

# Does the issue cut across different SO/ACs? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed

# Is there broad community interest across SO/ACs to engage on this topic? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed

Line 19:

# Is it likely that resolving the issue through a CCWG will have a substantial budgetary impact?

# What is the expected outcome?

# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for

# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for action/consideration?

action/consideration?

# What other alternatives are available to address the issue?

==ICANN CCWGs==

* [[Cross-Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions]] (CWG-Stewardship)

* [[Cross Community Committee on Accessibility]]

* [[Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability]]

* [[Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance]]

* [[Cross Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds]]

* [[Cross Community Working Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names as Top-Level Domains]]

==References==

[[Category:Working Groups]]

[[Category:Featured]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A Cross-Community Working Group is an [[ICANN]] community of practice that allows Supporting Organizations ([[SO]]s) and Advisory Committees ([[AC]]s) to work together to address an issue of common interest that does not fall within the scope of any single SO or AC. A CCWG is intended to inform and enhance or supplement policy development work, and may precede it, but does not replace it.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>
+A '''Cross Community Working Group''' (CCWG) is an [[ICANN]] community of practice that allows Supporting Organizations ([[SO]]s) and Advisory Committees ([[AC]]s) to work together to address an issue of common interest that does not fall within the scope of any single SO or AC. A CCWG is intended to inform and enhance or supplement policy development work, and may precede it, but does not replace it.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>
 ==Key Characteristics==
 * Adoption of a single charter drafted by a cross-community drafting team comprising
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * The chartering organizations shall not change the content of the deliverables
 * Sufficient opportunity should be provided for non-participating organizations to give input on draft CCWG deliverables<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 2, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>
+* In developing its output, work plan, and reports, the CCWG shall act by consensus and designate each position as either full consensus (where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection) or consensus (where a small minority disagrees, but most agree)ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 13, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>
 ==CCWG Formation==
 At least two drafting organizations must answer the following questions to determine whether they should form a CCWG. Some questions are closed (Yes/No) while others are open-ended.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf CCWG Uniform Framework 2016, pg. 7, GNSO, ICANN]</ref>
-# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC?
+# Is the issue outside of the scope of policy development for a specific SO or remit of an AC? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
-If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
 # Does the issue cut across different SO/ACs? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
 # Is there broad community interest across SO/ACs to engage on this topic? If Yes: it is suitable for a CCWG to be formed
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 # Is it likely that resolving the issue through a CCWG will have a substantial budgetary impact?
 # What is the expected outcome?
-# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for
+# Is the effort expected to produce recommendations that are intended to be submitted to the ICANN Board for action/consideration?
-action/consideration?
 # What other alternatives are available to address the issue?
+==ICANN CCWGs==
+* [[Cross-Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions]] (CWG-Stewardship)
+* [[Cross Community Committee on Accessibility]]
+* [[Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability]]
+* [[Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance]]
+* [[Cross Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds]]
+* [[Cross Community Working Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names as Top-Level Domains]]
+==References==
+[[Category:Working Groups]]
+[[Category:Featured]]