DNS Abuse Responses: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
======SSAC====== | ======SSAC====== | ||
:*The [[SSAC]] has published several documents on DNS Abuse measurement and mitigation | :*The [[SSAC]] has published several documents on DNS Abuse measurement and mitigation | ||
======ALAC====== | |||
:*At [[ICANN 74]], the [[ALAC]] held a session discussing end users' perspective and the role of [[RALO]]s in responding to DNS Abuse | |||
====IGF==== | ====IGF==== | ||
====DNS Abuse Institute==== | ====DNS Abuse Institute==== | ||
This newcomer is entirely focused on creating an interoperable framework to reduce DNS abuse. The [[DNS Abuse Institute|DNSAI]] acknowledges there are two options for reducing security threats: proactive and reactive methods. The institute is currently putting more of its energy into developing ''reactive tools'' because they can be used by anti-abuse or compliance personnel without requiring integration in registration platforms and thus, broad buy-in should be easier to secure.<ref>[https://dnsabuseinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DNS-Abuse-Institute-Roadmap.pdf DNSAI Roadmap pg. 9]</ref> | This newcomer is entirely focused on creating an interoperable framework to reduce DNS abuse. The [[DNS Abuse Institute|DNSAI]] acknowledges there are two options for reducing security threats: proactive and reactive methods. The institute is currently putting more of its energy into developing ''reactive tools'' because they can be used by anti-abuse or compliance personnel without requiring integration in registration platforms and thus, broad buy-in should be easier to secure.<ref>[https://dnsabuseinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DNS-Abuse-Institute-Roadmap.pdf DNSAI Roadmap pg. 9]</ref> | ||
* [[NetBeacon]] | |||
===Private Sector=== | ===Private Sector=== | ||
====Cybersecurity Providers==== | ====Cybersecurity Providers==== | ||